09-07-2013, 01:07 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
|
Murder most foul
I've been wondering about extradition.
Its been my assumption that murder is not an Imperial crime, if it takes place in a local planet's jurisdiction. At a starport or on a ship is another matter. So, Thug commits a murder on Planet X. He escapes to the starport and jumps to Planet Y. He is arrested on Planet Y for a minor crime. Can Planet X have an extradtion treaty with Planet Y? If so Planet Y sends Thug back to Planet X to face the consequences. If not, Thug, a known murderer, is allowed back on the streets of Planet Y. Does an extradtion treaty between two worlds violate the terms of Imperial membership? That is, no organization at the interstellar level? Is such extradtion part of Imperial membership, part of the perks of Imperial membership? If so, what about a world that abhors the death penalty? Planet Y doesn't want to extradite Thug because on Planet X the punishment for murder is death by public torture. Or murder on Planet Y is a misdemeanor. If extradtion treaties are allowed between member worlds, how are they monitored and controlled? Does this lead to other agreements, like cultural exchanges, edging up to trade agreements. I can see that trade agreements conflict directly with the Imperial sphere of influence, but how close can you get? Would the 3I ban extadition treaties just because they end up leading to 'mission creep' and ending up with trade disputes negotiated outside of the Imperial ageis? |
09-07-2013, 01:52 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Murder most foul
I suspect extradition treaties are legal, but you're missing a point: extradition treaties are not actually required. Absent a treaty, planet Y doesn't have to send him back, but it's under no obligation (unless one is imposed by local law) to not send him back.
|
09-07-2013, 02:00 PM | #3 | |||
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hans |
|||
09-08-2013, 12:56 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
|
|
09-08-2013, 02:42 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
A player group is less likely to just lob grenades into a camp they need to retrive a box of unobtainium from, if they might face murder charges that will follow them across the sector. And I would think that bounty hunters would need an extradition treaty, if only to make things run a little more smoothly. Planet X puts a Cr10k bountry on Thug's head, so bounty hunter Bob goes to Planet Y. Say Thug is not in custody, it just looks like Bob is wandering around Planet Y trying to kidnap Thug, since Thug has committed no crime on Planet Y. Simplified argument of course. With a treaty, Planet Y might not have a reason to arrest Thug, but they won't interfere with Bob when he kidnaps Thug and drags him to the starport. Or Planet Y could just have licensed Bounty Hunters, with no specific extradition treaty with any one planet. Or they might not give a fig what offworlders do as long as they don't make too much of a fuss. In this case I would think it depends on the law levels of the worlds in question. |
|
09-08-2013, 02:56 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
Planet Y might arrest Thug for jay walking, but why should they go to the trouble of sending him off to Planet X? Why should they be doing the bidding of Planet X? They don't even know if these murder charges are accurate. I'm sure Thug will say they are fabricated. Planet X might, in the future, return the favor - but that isn't a sure thing. Wearing red on Tuesdays might be a capital offense on Planet Y, is Planet X going to send someone back for that? Probably not, if no agreement is in place. |
|
09-08-2013, 03:02 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
Law level probably has a lot to do with it, as does location. Worlds in the same subsector or more likely to have treaties than worlds between subsectors, or sectors. Worlds close together, or on a trade route or main, or more likely to have agreements. A world off the beaten path, with a mid-, to poor-quality port probably doesn't have a treaty with anyone - and becomes a destination for thugs, low-lifes and PCs. |
|
09-08-2013, 04:28 PM | #8 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
Quote:
Because they have no reason not to. Only if he makes himself unwelcome on planet X. |
||
09-08-2013, 04:33 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
Hans |
|
09-08-2013, 06:32 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: traveller
|
Re: Murder most foul
Quote:
"The home rule provisions of the Imperial Charter for the world clearly prohibit interference in internal affairs, and as long as the Solomani stay within the law, the hands of the lmperium are tied." Double Adventure 3a, The Argon Gambit, p. 12. "Due to the nature of the Imperial Charter's home-rule provisions, the lmperium cannot intervene to suppress the Solomani Party on lntanevac unless they actively engage in treason, or in the event of a declared Imperial emergency." Ibid., p. 17. (There's a fair amount of flavor text on politics, local and Imperial, in the rest of that adventure as well.) Using the same term for member worlds as for corporations (Supp. 8, p. 40) and institutions (Supp. 11, p. 15) leads one to wonder whether the Imperium considers all three to be the same in some respects. |
|
Tags |
crime, international, law enforcement |
|
|