12-18-2014, 04:05 AM | #1 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
[SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevators'?
Greetings, all!
Sanitised Metabolism grants '+1 to reaction rolls in close confines (cramped spaceships, submarines, eleva- tors, etc.)'. Now, I'm wondering just how often the opportunity to benefit from it actually arises. Now it looks like a significant part of the time, it would be deliberately arranged: Sure, either you're on a submarine/spaceship, or not. But making sure the make the important requests when you 'accidentally' end up riding the same elevator as your target seems like a viable strategy. It also seems that at least half the time, it's easy to arrange a close approach when using Sex Appeal: as long as it's possible to get close to the target, either the +1 helps get a success at Sex Appeal (so you end up being a daring but very-well-reacted-to character), or it fails, and you get a Bad Reaction anyway (so you creep out the target one way or another, and it's extremely unlikely to make a difference). Thoughts on the topic? More viable cases of application? Thanks in advance! |
12-18-2014, 04:13 AM | #2 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Most hygienic people don't stink in elevators after only the few seconds to minutes it normally takes to ride them.
Stuck in one worrying for hours would raise the issue, of course.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
12-18-2014, 04:14 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
I honestly find the +1 to be kind of weird. I expect it's actually "Won't get a -1 from accidentally farting or having BO, which is only noticeable in enclosed spaces," but that's really hard to adjudicate in game, so it becomes a +1.
Only, the very reasons that makes the random -1s for being a smelly human hard to adjudicate make the +1 rather hard to run as well. Basically, you get it whenever you DON'T fart or DON'T have BO in the sort of circumstances where doing so would get you a -1.
__________________
My Blog: Mailanka's Musing. Currently Playing: Psi-Wars, a step-by-step exploration of building your own Space Opera setting, inspired by Star Wars. |
12-18-2014, 05:00 AM | #4 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Humans evolved to produce stink above and beyond that automatic to all animals.
Only humans, chimps, and gorillas among primates have armpit stank, for example. Lack of stink is most assuredly inhuman, not merely lacking unusual odor.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
12-18-2014, 12:28 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Yeah, it's broken. "I'd like you more if we had met in an elevator" does not make any sense. It's clearly intended to be you don't suffer a penalty that you might otherwise, not that you get a bonus.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
12-18-2014, 02:33 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Quote:
We don't tend to think these people are aliens, monsters, or baboons.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
|
12-19-2014, 02:48 AM | #7 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Quote:
People smell. Pretending we don't under any circumstances that won't add enormous amounts of perfume/chemical scent seems like some kind of cultural delusion.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
12-19-2014, 04:58 AM | #8 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Quote:
Now, whether the intended mechanic was to offset penalties is an interesting question. But 'offsets a -1 penalty that is usually not factored into reaction rolls even when it might anyway' seems very meh compared to other Perks. Also, an interesting note is that Sanitised Metabolism isn't restricted to smell only. |
|
12-19-2014, 05:17 AM | #9 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Has anyone ever created its opposite? I think we all know or are ones that render bathrooms HazMat superfund sites, or need two or more showers on days of major exercise.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
12-19-2014, 06:04 AM | #10 | ||
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: [SE] Sanitized Metabolism: how useful is +1 in in 'close confines', like 'elevato
Quote:
Make them a vegan instead of a meat eater, and the effect is even easier to achieve. Quote:
A problem that's more periodic (terribly foul farts but not terribly frequent farts) could probably be tinkered together from Bad Smell and the Frequency of Appearance rules for reputation.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog Last edited by Bruno; 12-19-2014 at 01:49 PM. |
||
Tags |
sanitized metabolism, social engineering |
|
|