06-06-2012, 02:09 PM | #11 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Scientology
Is it really cool to attack a real world religion like this? Wouldn't listing infernal patrons for LDS or Islam get you in trouble? I think all religons are bogus, but I'm trying real hard to treat them all with some amount of courtesy in public. What makes Scientololgy any different from the rest of them? Doesn't the Line Editor have some connection to Scientology?
|
06-06-2012, 04:22 PM | #12 |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: Scientology
I don't think we're attacking it at all; part of the nature of a game like this is that it does take up the issue of real-world religions and where they would weigh in on the War. (Please note that I included both infernal and angelic possibilities for the church's opponents, and that another poster did the same for the source of the E-Meter.)
The big boys aren't necessarily immune, for that matter. Note that the Archangel listed as a dedicated patron of Islam, until recently, was the one closest to a Fall -- to the point where there was a writeup of his Demon Prince form in case a campaign went that way. And there's at least one demon in Liber Servitorum who claims to have posed as Christ ... though he is a Balseraph, so you can take what he says with an entire salt mine.
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
06-06-2012, 04:27 PM | #13 | |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Scientology
Quote:
EDIT: Although wouldn't calling Christ, Mohammed or Joseph Smith "a delusional paranoid with a greedy streak" be inappropriate? I may think these things (in fact for the most part I do), but saying them seems to be considered rude. |
|
06-06-2012, 08:06 PM | #14 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Scientology
I think part of the issue with Scientology is that IN groups Religions into the following.
1)Abrahamic (including the 19th/20th century split offs like the Mormons, the Christian Scientists, Unification Church (Moonies) etc) 2) Buddhist 3) Eastern Philosophies that aren't really capital R religions from an IN standpoint (Confusianism/Shinto) 4) Dead religions (Greek, Norse, Aztec) with a few oddball categories like the Christian Syncretic (Loa, Voudun) and the Wiccans. I can't think of any religion other than Scientology in the Western World that is both organized and which doesn't trace at least some of its Religion to the Adam/Noah/Abraham of the Jewish Bible (or some close variant thereof). |
06-06-2012, 08:08 PM | #15 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Scientology
There's also the fact that many don't consider it a real religion at all. I almost want to call it a Church of Mammon. But that might offend people.
I'm sure all the modern big religions had the same issue back in the day. But with IN, and its verifiable truths, it can't be acceptable in game, no matter the real world issues.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
06-07-2012, 05:31 AM | #16 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Scientology
My wife reminded me of Raelism as another one that falls into this category.
|
06-07-2012, 09:13 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Boston
|
Re: Scientology
Leveling blasphemies at historical and mythological figures within the context of the game world should be, I think, obviously okay. Portraying all e.g. all Christians as credulous fanatics, by contrast, is problematic for the same reason doing so in any work of fiction is problematic, and discussing whether an historical figure was a fraud in the actual world is off-topic.
That said, my take in-world would be something like:
|
06-07-2012, 06:13 PM | #18 |
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellflower, CA
|
Re: Scientology
|
06-07-2012, 06:24 PM | #19 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Scientology
Quote:
Or easy to swallow a lie when wrapped in a truth or half-truth. Or True innovation is rare even for bad science fiction writers.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
06-08-2012, 01:51 AM | #20 | ||||
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Madison, WI
|
Re: Scientology
Quote:
Please accept my apology for the inflammatory language I used to describe L. Ron Hubbard: My intended point was that any leader with a bad reputation can be crazy, selfish, or something worse, without automatically being a direct minion of Hell in game terms. Quote:
Quote:
This attitude fits better with backwards/low-contrast play: Hell created Scientology as a tool for liberating mankind from Heaven's mindless conformity. Lilith endorses the Church's idea that knowledge is power, and power is true Freedom; but Fleurity condemns Scientology for its strong anti-drug teachings. Quote:
__________________
Ingeborg S. Nordén |
||||
Tags |
theories |
|
|