12-13-2015, 11:59 AM | #741 | |
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Quote:
But think about where GURPS is in required investment for support. It requires lots, and also ongoing rules and game continuity checks, where a card game like Munchkin is basically the AMRAAM of games: lock on to a concept, turn the team loose, fire it off, and let it find its target. GURPS is the Sparrow (AIM7), which requires constant guidance from the launch platform. Munchkin is hugely profitable and all the long-tail stuff comes with no effort. GURPS is not and requires the constant effort of no fewer than three full-time staff. Fully burdened, I suspect that comes to $200,000 per year. That meas you're right - GURPS doesn't get its fair share of resources. It gets far more than it's share of resources given the return. I love GURPS, write for it, and am playing in one campaign, about to start as a PC in another, and have my own campaign on hiatus. But I have no illusions that the reason that SJG keeps it is because they love it, not because it makes great business sense to do so, with a reasonable dose of "this was my major contribution to RPG-dom, and I'm not likely going to spin it off and have some uncautious punk ruin my legacy" from SJ, though that may or may not be accurate - I'm imputing perhaps improper motives to someone not-me. That's always dangerous. But really, a dispassionate businessman would either shut it down or spin it off, whereupon the most probably outcome is that the new management runs it into the ground or at least fails to make any appreciable change in the trajectory. Because that's what happens about 95% of the time - sometimes past performance IS an indication of future results, and while the race may not always go to the swift, or the battle to the strong, wise investors place their money on the strong or swift. Perhaps long-winded, but my take-away from interviewing SJ and conversations on the record with the SJG staff charged with GURPS is that they keep it because it's important to them to do so, but the opportunity costs of "more GURPS" are too high to increase the relative subsidy it already gets. The one thing I do infer from Phil's statements is that they're taking the Patreon/Kickstarter (or something of that ilk) option very seriously. They may not pull the trigger on it, but since he's mentioned it two or three times, and he's the CEO, that means mindshare is high. CEOs, by and large in my not-inconsiderable experience with them, don't drop off statements that can be redirected to press agencies lightly.
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
|
12-13-2015, 12:20 PM | #742 |
I do stuff and things.
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Hasbro owns G.I. Joe and Transformers, two significant properties that have had decades of support and sales. Hasbro licenses Star Wars and have held the license (if we include the time Kenner was a separate company) for almost four decades (minus a window of time in the early nineties when Hasbro let the Kenner license expire).
In Hasbro's 2014 annual report (http://investor.hasbro.com/annuals.cfm) those three brands are mentioned: * G.I. Joe - 5 times * Transformers - 46 times * Star Wars - 30 times Transformers saw a new film in 2014 and continues to be one of Hasbro's top seven brands. It's clear why the property received as many mentions in the report as it did. Why would Hasbro put more resources into Star Wars -- a brand they license -- instead of one of their own (G.I. Joe) properties? Because consumer demand and product sales told Hasbro Star Wars deserved more attention than G.I. Joe. A lower level of support and presence for G.I. Joe does not mean that Hasbro has neglected or abandoned G.I. Joe. What this means is that they're giving G.I. Joe reduced attention until they determine their next major initiative for the brand. And if we look at the three brands through Google Trends then Hasbro's actions are reinforced and make even more sense: http://www.google.com/trends/explore...%2B6&content=1 #googletrendsexplore
__________________
Battlegrip.com, my blog about toys. |
12-13-2015, 12:23 PM | #743 | |
I do stuff and things.
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Quote:
__________________
Battlegrip.com, my blog about toys. |
|
12-13-2015, 02:58 PM | #744 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Truth in this.
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
12-13-2015, 04:15 PM | #745 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K.
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
"Fair share" is a dubious concept here, either way, but if it means anything, one might note that, from what's been said in these threads, (a) GURPS products are expected to make sufficient profits to contribute significantly to covering the company's overheads, and (b) SJGames appears to have proportionately higher overheads than smaller companies which focus solely on RPGs.
So, "fairness" or not, GURPS has apparently paid for a bit of the company's infrastructure, and one could reasonably hope that that infrastructure could provide relatively hefty support.
__________________
-- Phil Masters My Home Page. My Self-Publications: On Warehouse 23 and On DriveThruRPG. |
12-13-2015, 04:27 PM | #746 | |
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Quote:
I would be very surprised - though I'm in basically no position to know - to hear that GURPS did more than basically break even, maybe plus a few percent. If that. Last time I did the math, the sales of all published e23 items (before that disappeared) over a several year period added up to a very low number. But I was working from what was definitely vastly incomplete data, so I can only say I walked away fervently hoping that my conclusion was vastly wrong.
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon |
|
12-13-2015, 07:04 PM | #747 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
I am convinced of one thing after reading these posts, SJ Games are as committed to an under preforming brand as ANY company could be. I'd dare say more so. Fortunately while Gurps is in "the ER" it doesn't seem to be flat lining yet. If Diskworld and Mars Attacks comes out and fails, Phil is totally correct in that SJ buyers are going to be hard pressed to buy into the next big Gurps release. Gurps is (and probably has been) at a critical junction in it's life. I'm glad this report came out and we we're let in on the secret that most of us knew in the pit of out stomach for the last few years. On the lighter side, I hope Car Wars pans out for you guys as you've been working on it for a while now.
|
12-13-2015, 08:57 PM | #748 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MO, U.S.A.
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
I have seen several comments about successful Kickstarter projects leading to "stacks of Hardbacks" at various Conventions. Does anyone know how many of these projects actually make money by the time they are done?
__________________
Xenophilia is Dr. Who. Plus Lecherous is Jack Harkness.- Anaraxes |
12-13-2015, 10:35 PM | #749 | |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Quote:
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
|
12-13-2015, 10:41 PM | #750 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
|
Re: Report To The Stakeholders
Quote:
You really think Pelgrane Press, Atlas games etc don't know how to run a budget? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|