08-15-2014, 03:18 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK
|
Unarmed off-hand
Martial Arts, under Harsh Realism for Unarmed Fighters, says "The Basic Set treats unarmed combat favorably: there's no "off" hand..."
This certainly implies no off-hand penalty, and I'm fairly sure that Kromm has stated on the boards somewhere that this is the case. But is this explicitly stated anywhere in the core rules, covering unarmed combat in general? In the Basic Set under the individual skills: Wrestling/Sumo Wrestling: requires two hands to parry one attack Boxing: explicitly allows you to parry an attack with each hand, Parry is 2/3+3, no mention of penalty for off hand, no mention of attacking with off hand. Brawling: Same as Boxing Judo: Same Karate: Same PLUS explicitly has no penalty for attacking with the off hand. So, none of the unarmed skills explicitly say no penalty for parrying with the off-hand but could be considered to implicitly say it while Karate is the only skill to explicitly say no off-hand penalty to attack, implying that the penalty is there for all the rest. Under the general rules for parrying (no reference to unarmed): "Parrying with the Off Hand: You parry with your “off” hand (your left or “shield” hand if right handed; see Handedness, p. 17), or with a weapon held in it, at -4 to skill. Since Parry is calculated off half skill, this gives -2 to Parry. You may ignore this penalty if you have the Ambidexterity advantage." No explicit mention of unarmed but the part I bolded seems to indicate the rule would apply to unarmed. Under the general rules for parrying unarmed, no mention of off handed penalties one way or another. It seems to me that this would be the place to mention an exception to the off hand parrying penalty. In addition, the wording for parrying with DX is exactly the same as the wording under the four one parry per hand unarmed skills (Your Parry active defense is 3 + half your skill or DX, dropping all fractions.) So if there is no off-hand penalty for skill use, there should not be any off-hand penalty using DX either. Is there anywhere else in the Basic Set that discusses unarmed parries? Or even something more explicit in Martial Arts? Do all unarmed skills attack with no off-hand penalty? Do all unarmed skills parry with no off-hand penalty?
__________________
MiB 7704 Playing: GURPS Nordlond Dragons of Hosgarth Running Savage Worlds Tour of Darkness (Vietnam + Mythos) |
08-15-2014, 07:32 AM | #2 |
Fightin' Round the World
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
|
Re: Unarmed off-hand
You've found the relevant bits already:
- Basic Set never says unarmed off-hand parries have a handedness penalty. - there is no mention of an off-hand attacking penalty for unarmed attacks. - Martial Arts explicitly states the case that Basic Set makes implicitly, by not mentioning a penalty, and says giving a penalty for off-hand unarmed attacks and parries is an optional rule.
__________________
Peter V. Dell'Orto aka Toadkiller_Dog or TKD My Author Page My S&C Blog My Dungeon Fantasy Game Blog "You fall onto five death checks." - Andy Dokachev |
08-15-2014, 12:08 PM | #3 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK
|
Re: Unarmed off-hand
Quote:
"Parrying with the Off Hand: You parry with your “off” hand or with a weapon held in it, at -4 to skill. Since Parry is calculated off half skill, this gives -2 to Parry. You may ignore this penalty if you have the Ambidexterity advantage." What is meant by "or with a weapon held in it" but indicating that the rule applies without a weapon in your hand - unarmed? or: Under Melee Attacks (BS 369): "You can make a melee attack using any ready melee weapon (including a natural weapon such as a kick, bite, or punch)..." That means that all the rules governing melee attacks apply to unarmed attacks as well, unless excluded, right? Then, under To Hit: "Applying all conditional modifiers for your maneuver, situation, ...A detailed list appears under Melee Attack Maneuvers." This list includes the off-hand penalty. This means that the off-hand penalty applies to unarmed, unless excluded somewhere. So please point out where the Basic Set excludes unarmed attacks from the above rules, or where my logic fails.
__________________
MiB 7704 Playing: GURPS Nordlond Dragons of Hosgarth Running Savage Worlds Tour of Darkness (Vietnam + Mythos) |
|
08-15-2014, 01:09 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cambridge, MA
|
Re: Unarmed off-hand
Quote:
I think the quote from Martial Arts is referring to Karate specifically. That said, one of the cool things about Brawling (vs. Karate) is that there's no restriction on being armed. I think it's kind of cool to stab one guy with a sword and punch the other, so I would probably scrap off-hand penalties for unarmed attacks and defenses in general. That's house-rule territory though. |
|
08-15-2014, 07:10 PM | #5 | |
Fightin' Round the World
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey
|
Re: Unarmed off-hand
Quote:
It's all in that box on p. 124 of Martial Arts. I'm not sure what else you need. If that's not sufficient, rule however you think Basic Set and Martial Arts are telling you to rule on this.
__________________
Peter V. Dell'Orto aka Toadkiller_Dog or TKD My Author Page My S&C Blog My Dungeon Fantasy Game Blog "You fall onto five death checks." - Andy Dokachev |
|
08-16-2014, 09:37 AM | #6 | |||
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
|
Re: Unarmed off-hand
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by Captain Joy; 04-04-2017 at 08:35 AM. |
|||
Tags |
off hand parries, off-hand parrying, off-hand punching, retcon |
|
|