12-22-2007, 12:18 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
Our brave hero (having just purchased High Tech on PDF) is facing the charging hordes of four-armed green-skinned Martians, sword in one hand, the firing line for a Schneider Mle 1897 (pink-skinned martian copy) in the other. Smiling in grim humour, our naked (but for his bandoliers and pistols) hero uses his stronger earth-born muscles to pull the cord, firing a round of shrapnel into the enemy!
Our hero is initially heartened, as his efforts produce a blast of 270 musket ball sized shots square into the teeth of the enemy, each doing 2d-1 pi+ damage! The carnage shall be awful! Rolling his Artillery(Cannon)-15 skill, he cannot believe his luck. A 5! With the +8 bonus to hit for his ROF of 270, the fist savage in the path of this wall of destruction is rent to pieces by 18 hits. Gleeful, our hero looks to the next victim! Only... There is no next victim. Thats it. 270 shots, one very dead savage. Desperately, our hero searches pages 408-410 for answers. Shotguns and Multiple Projectiles? No, no, thats what hes done already (1x270 ROF). Rapid Fire vs Close Stationary Targets? Look man, the savages are charging across the red Martian plain, hooting and hollering. Spraying Fire, surely! Okay, ROF 5+... well 1x270 surely qualifies, even if its not exactly WRITTEN that way. Ignore it. Engage in succession... okay, surely an artifact of the rules... Separate attack rolls yes yes, tedious but doable... add +1 Recoil for your attck on the second target, +2 Recoil when you engage the third target... Now wait a damn minute. Even his heroic roll of a 5 will affect no more than 17 targets, but hes unlikely to roll that well for each target, and besides, he has to split that 270 over all the targets, reducing the +8 bonus in any event. That doesnt seem right... Suppression Fire maybe? No, that takes an entire second and an All-out Attack, and all hes doing is pulling the trigger once here. In despair, our hero uses his mighty earth born muscles to lift the cannon out of its carriage. Perhaps it will be more effective as a giant club... Anyone care to help our hero out here? The best I can do is spraying fire, which doesnt seem to be written for the kind of attack a shrapnel shot (never mind Behive with its _thousands_ of shots) does. It seems like theres a rule missing here somewhere, and I cant find it in Basic or in High Tech (Which, honestly, was where I hoped to find it). Chandley
__________________
My GURPS stuff |
12-22-2007, 04:13 AM | #2 |
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
My first instinct would be to check the stats provided for the Claymore mine. I'm AFMB at the moment, so I can't give you a page reference, but as I recall it has rules on how to deal with a wide shot pattern, in approximately the same quantities.
|
12-22-2007, 07:07 AM | #3 | |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Heartland, U.S.A.
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
Quote:
Possibility 1: The martian savages are not shoulder to shoulder and the situation occurs exactly as you have described. As a GM, I'd do it this way if my PCs were attacking competent foes. Possibility 2: The martian savages are not shoulder to shoulder, but within a few yards of each other and the Schneider's "wall of destruction" is wider than this, in which case you should use the Suppression Fire rules on p. B409. As a GM, I'd do it this was if my PCs were attacking martian savages. Possibility 3: The approaching martian savages are effectively a Close Stationary Target (p. B408) and will be hit by half the shots. As a GM, I might do it this way in order to speed up an unimportant combat. It sounds like you may be imagining a situation between possibilities #1 and #2 and neither by itself seems perfect. I would offer a hybrid solution: apply Possibility 1 vs the lead/center martian savage and apply Possibility 2 to the closest near-by foes. Last edited by Captain Joy; 12-22-2007 at 07:15 AM. |
|
12-22-2007, 09:05 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
P. 389, Hitting the Wrong Target?
"If you hit with a ranged weapon and miss, you may hit someone else." So you missed with 252 shots, and the guy behind the one you did hit gets attacked by those shots. Although the above quote continues "You must check for this if you fail your attack roll", but that's how I'd go with it. It would work nicely if you'd also spread your fire, and there are lots of other martians behind each of those initial 5 guys. |
12-22-2007, 10:13 AM | #5 | ||||
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
Quote:
Edit: Im incorrect here. They cannot be any distance apart at all. Its 2 shots per yard. So this gives a maximum spread of 135 yards for my 270 pellets, and the rather bizzare case that cannister or beehive with more shots can spread farther, regardless of the range to the target. Which fails my sense of reality check anyway... This fails all kinds of tests, but the most iimportant is that canister/shrapnel rounds from cannon are NOT "walking automatic fire", like what the rules on Spraying Fire, B409, are meant to cover. So, this ones out. Quote:
It might be possible to waive the All-out attack and full second requirements and kit-bash suppression fire into something appropriate. Of course, the shooter STILL gets to pick his 2-yard target zones (though multiples must be adjacent), which basically means the character could decide to fire on one 2-yard zone with one shot, twenty-seven 2-yard zones with the next.. which is not how canister shot really works. Quote:
Quote:
But this seems the way to go. Now, are there resources anywhere that give approximate arcs for the cones of cannister, shrapnel and beehive rounds? Chandley
__________________
My GURPS stuff Last edited by chandley; 12-22-2007 at 10:52 AM. |
||||
12-22-2007, 11:29 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: A nice, warm rock with an excellent view of the Damned
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
High-Tech goes into some detail here on p. 172-173, requiring followup reading on B409 and 414 (shotgun rules, spreading attacks incl cones) - but I cannot find one essential piece of info: the max width of the cones mentioned. Without this we basically don't know the shape of the cones. This should probably have been included with the stats on each individual gun (as other such stats are), but isn't, AFAICT. Can anyone see this stat somewhere?
__________________
The Wrathchild |
12-22-2007, 07:26 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: B'ham AL
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
treat it as a cone shaoed attack?
I would type more but I hsave a three month old in the other hand. |
12-22-2007, 07:55 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
12-22-2007, 08:04 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
Ah, having read the OP more carefully, I see another problem - shrapnel doesn't work work like a shotgun anyway, but instead is an airbursting frag round in effect. Exactly how this works with the stats given I'm not sure, but presumably you'd treat it like a normal airburst, but with a better 'Rcl', 1 rather than 3.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
12-22-2007, 10:59 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Multiple projectiles and the charging horde
Quote:
Chandley
__________________
My GURPS stuff |
|
|
|