Insubstantiality and affects substantial

[Finalsora811]

Originally Posted by Sunrunners_Fire

Same thing. The fluff isn't relevant, only the crunch, when discussing what the crunch does.

Fluff suggests crunch but doesn't dictate it.

"I spray them with a jet of chlorine trifluoride" vs "I spray them with a jet of water", assuming the same underlying advantage, gives the same mechanical result regardless of what chlorine trifluoride does. (Go look it up. Its' a lovely, lovely, thing. Even the Nazi wouldn't touch it. Too scary for them.)

Ah. I was thinking I could apply a body of water meta-trait and it would be easier or something. But apparently not.

[Bruno]

Originally Posted by Sunrunners_Fire

"I spray them with a jet of chlorine trifluoride" vs "I spray them with a jet of water", assuming the same underlying advantage, gives the same mechanical result regardless of what chlorine trifluoride does. (Go look it up. Its' a lovely, lovely, thing. Even the Nazi wouldn't touch it. Too scary for them.)

I recommend reading this for an amusing overview on CIF3

[Sunrunners_Fire]

Originally Posted by Bruno

I recommend reading this for an amusing overview on CIF3

One of the few blogs I actually read. :)