Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin
Ick! This severely penalizes flexible mages and benefits no one significantly except the Johnny One-Spell. Not at all what I'd want to do.
At best you are reducing a mages number of spells by a factor of 4. What you should do after that is totally revise the spell list to make the average utility of spells 4x greater.
|
Hopefully, that should put the final nail in the coffin of the argument that I'm being too generous. :)
Yes, this approach makes mages with a lot of spells more expensive. But then, I've seen plenty of arguments that Magic is underpriced compared to Powers — largely due to this very reason: mages get a
huge price break due to gaining much effectiveness from contributing only a single point to each spell. So from that perspective, the higher expense of being a mage under this tweak is a
feature.