04-14-2018, 02:04 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Behind the moon
|
Re: A question about applicability
where else would treasure come from?
|
04-14-2018, 02:51 PM | #12 |
Join Date: Apr 2018
|
Re: A question about applicability
In This specific case? A pile of treasure and a Rose on top.
That is, after Rose resolved. Playing Much Ado afterwards, while confirmed as legal, has me very confused about the target. Since at that point, there is no monster for it to remove the treasure from. Only a pile of treasure. Since this isn't Magic and therefore there is no Stack, you cant react by playing an instant on my sorcery to nulify my gains. You have to deal with what my card did. And my card removes the monster and leaves only treasure. Telling me afterwards that Monsters now have no treasure is a fine idea. But there isn't any monster left to wich that applies. |
04-14-2018, 03:27 PM | #13 |
Munchkin Line Editor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
|
Re: A question about applicability
The question has been asked and answered. If you want to discuss it further, please take it to the main Munchkin forum. The 101 forum is for Q&A, not lengthy rule conversations.
__________________
Andrew Hackard, Munchkin Line Editor If you have a question that isn't getting answered, we have a thread for that. Let people like what they like. Don't be a gamer hater. #PlayMunchkin on social media: Twitter || Facebook || Instagram || YouTube Follow us on Kickstarter: Steve Jackson Games and Warehouse 23 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|