03-04-2021, 04:19 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Bike minimum ST
I have a question about bikes.
In the Basic p.188 in Driving Motorcycle, It's specifiy that large motorcycles often have a Minimum ST, just like a weapon. As a biker, I agree with this. But where I can find this stat ? Because I looked for in the Basic and High-Tech and I can't find it. |
03-04-2021, 04:40 PM | #2 | |
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
Quote:
Edit: Grammar; "a" -> "an".
__________________
In which I post about a TL9-10 solar system http://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=169674 If you don't know why I said something, please ask. Assumptions are the death of courtesy. Disappointed in the behaviour I have too-often encountered here. Last edited by Say, it isn't that bad!; 03-04-2021 at 08:17 PM. |
|
03-04-2021, 06:02 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
My personal opinion is that no-one should ride a motorcycle that she cannot pull upright by herself in the event of a tumble. That would mean the bike's weight cannot exceed half of the character's Extra-heavy encumbrance. So a 400 lb bike would have Min ST of 10.
Last edited by Donny Brook; 03-04-2021 at 08:07 PM. |
03-04-2021, 06:56 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
Quote:
|
|
03-04-2021, 08:06 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Snoopy's basement
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
|
03-05-2021, 02:39 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rome, Italy
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
Quote:
BTW you would be amazed on how often this rule is broken in real life... :D Here in Italy we are a little obsessed by bikes so is it not uncommon to see people trying to step from a Vespa to a CBR600 RR or pretending to tame a mastodon like the BMW 1200GS as a commuting option.
__________________
“A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?” |
|
03-05-2021, 06:01 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
Quote:
I'd also be generous with any such MinST. Most bikes are managable by people of average ST, so very few should have MinST higher than ST9-10. Round here it's the idiots on 250cc 'crotch rockets' that give motorcyclists a bad name (some of these bikes are prohobited for these licences, but the list is quite short). The learner licence limits what you're allowed to ride by engine size, and 250cc is the upper limit, so you get people (by which I really mean young men) with very limited experience on a bike with lots of power, very little weight, and next to no stability. This goes exactly as well as you'd expect.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
03-05-2021, 06:36 AM | #8 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
Quote:
The vast majority of modern motorcycles can be handled by anyone of the apropriate size regardless of their physical strength. They rely on technique and experience instead of force. Even if you could bench a specific bike, you'd have issues riding it if you're notably smaller or larger than the intended rider. |
|
03-05-2021, 07:30 AM | #9 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Panama
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
Quote:
A person with the minimum ST or more will have an easier time than a low TS one. Handling the bike also means balancing the heavy weight and keeping it steady at low speed. Easy driving across a paved street doesn't need a roll. Where I live the motorcycle license allow anyone to ride anything with 2 wheels, so you sometimes see people trying to handle big bikes and then selling them, most of the time middle aged men with good status that always wanted to ride a big harley davidson. |
|
03-05-2021, 07:35 AM | #10 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Re: Bike minimum ST
I think tiny bikes you can easily pick up like tiny Honda Spree may be the hardest to control so don't think it is strictly weight related
|
|
|