10-28-2018, 07:05 PM | #51 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Might have something to do with getting it to burn in a proper way to actually propel a bullet, which means you want fairly precise control over burn rate. Black powder is incapable of detonation, so you can be a bit less careful.
|
10-28-2018, 07:24 PM | #52 | |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Quote:
I do suppose you could step back to the earlier Rocket Ball ammo, which lacked a contained primer, and electrically ignite the powder, although you need reasons not to use cases (lack of sufficient metal or manufacturing facilities are two).
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM, Brandon Cope GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com |
|
10-28-2018, 08:41 PM | #53 |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Land of Enchantment
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
TL;DR
Don't know if this was addressed, but we talked a lot about primers in this thread a while ago. After page 10 or so it degenerates into fanboyism, though. You are warned.
__________________
I'd need to get a grant and go shoot a thousand goats to figure it out. Last edited by acrosome; 10-28-2018 at 08:51 PM. |
10-29-2018, 07:49 AM | #54 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Quote:
Source: Personal experience lighting the stuff.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
10-29-2018, 07:56 AM | #55 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Black Powder, especially stuff that doesn't have the grains coating in graphite (modern large-grain black powder intended for blasting has the grains coated in graphite to make them safer, among other things), can build up quite a static charge if shaken for a while, as it might be while being transported, and if that discharges in a spark, you have a problem. It's also shock sensitive if not packed right, though not reliably (you can't expect it to go off when you want it to, just when you don't).
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
10-29-2018, 12:32 PM | #56 | |
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Quote:
I could see that with a little ingenuity you could embed the match head and thin wire within the case of the cartridge and connect the thin wires to two electrically insulated parts of the case that make contact with external connectors within the gun. Of course you need a supply of matches, but that may be less of an issue than real primers in even a post apocalypse setting. |
|
10-29-2018, 05:23 PM | #57 | |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Land of Enchantment
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Quote:
In fact, one of the ways to make an improvised electrical detonator- from that (in)famous US Army Improvised Munitions manual, section 6.1- is to use a light bulb filament to set off black powder. Fun fact- this manual was on a bookshelf in Sid's room, in the animated movie Toy Story. TM 31-210. I imagine that I'll now be on some watchlist for posting that link... But it does make me nostalgic for my youth. I'd be in a federal SuperMax if I were a kid in 2018. The feds no longer have any sense of humor whatsoever regarding such youthful shenanigans.
__________________
I'd need to get a grant and go shoot a thousand goats to figure it out. Last edited by acrosome; 10-29-2018 at 05:33 PM. |
|
10-29-2018, 05:24 PM | #58 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Quote:
Also known around this thread as... primer. ;) |
|
10-29-2018, 05:29 PM | #59 | |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Land of Enchantment
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
Quote:
Fun times.
__________________
I'd need to get a grant and go shoot a thousand goats to figure it out. Last edited by acrosome; 10-29-2018 at 06:13 PM. |
|
10-30-2018, 07:44 PM | #60 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte, North Caroline, United States of America, Earth?
|
Re: [AtE] Black Powder vs Smokeless
The chemistry is fascinating, but beyond me. But, what about the mechanical parts? Smokeless powder is far more energetic than blackpowder, and weapons that can safely fire blackpowder may not be able to handle the higher pressures of smokeless, and definitely NEVER anywhere near the same amount of smokeless. If you don't have access to dependable good quality steel, smokeless powder can be really dangerous. Blackpowder on the other hand, you can get away with using a lo more materials to make your guns, ranging from common blackpipe for plumbing or forgewelded guns(really dangerous).
Also, the types of actions you can use change. Anything gas powered is right out if you're using blackpowder, while Blowback and Recoil operated firearms would work. This works as a upper bound to what sort of automatic firearms you can use: past pistol sized cartridges, blowback doesn't really work. Which is when you get into other variants of blowback designs, which can produce weapons like autocannons or machineguns(the MG42 was delayed rollback, as were the FAMAS and G3). Automatic blackpowder guns are also going to produce clouds of smoke. Which is kind of cool.
__________________
Hydration is key |
Tags |
ate |
|
|