|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-17-2012, 04:27 PM | #21 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Re: Ruling combat involving Wandering Monster with Wannabe Vampire against a Cleric
Quote:
Quote:
The 'booga booga' keyword only scares away the Wannabe Vampire. It's only weaknesses that last while the monster is still around to fight that affect the entire group of monsters. |
||
03-19-2012, 01:08 PM | #22 |
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
|
Re: Ruling combat involving Wandering Monster with Wannabe Vampire against a Cleric
Can I get a moderators clarification on this please. Andrew, anyone? Because, it still seems to me that both monsters would have the weakness of having to run away since the wanna be vampire monsters weakness is for a cleric to say that and that happens. Just like if a monster had a weakness, as the quote says, to fire all monsters in combat would have it! Soooooooo.........
|
03-19-2012, 03:38 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Macungie, PA
|
Re: Ruling combat involving Wandering Monster with Wannabe Vampire against a Cleric
It only applies to the Wannabe Vampire. Since I said it, that makes it official. This is not some weakness that allows someone to get an added bonus under some circumstance that someone could argue gets canceled because the other Monsters don't have the same weakness...
|
03-19-2012, 04:23 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
|
Re: Ruling combat involving Wandering Monster with Wannabe Vampire against a Cleric
TY very much MuchkinMan! Your ruling makes me feel warm and fuzzy. Unfortunately, I saw it the other way, which made all the other cards in question make sense. So now, I'm left with what is a weakness exactly? The Frost Giant reads: Any fire or flame does double damage against it. That doesnt say weakness, but sounds just like a weakness. The Large Angry Chicken reads: Fried chicken is delicious. Gain an extra level if you defeat it with fire or flame. That doesnt really sound like a weakness, but I thought it was. Maybe even a clarification on weaknesses or strengths that WOULD carry over to other monsters, 'cuz this thread also states that a monster gaining a +5 against someone would just be that one monster in combat, not others that may have been wandered in. Maybe a guideline on these could be produced kind of like what was done with whats allowed for the Cheat! card? I stand corrected also on my original thought of the wife saying booga booga and getting the level. The wannabe vampire states that you dont gain the level.
|
03-19-2012, 05:12 PM | #25 | |||
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Re: Ruling combat involving Wandering Monster with Wannabe Vampire against a Cleric
Quote:
Quote:
And if you were facing the Large Angry Chicken and the Frost Giant and you had one fire based item, the bonus would be doubled and you'd get the extra level. Nobody would be able to argue that you need to choose which one you use the item against. Quote:
|
|||
Tags |
clerics, combat rules, wandering monster, wanna be vampire |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|