10-28-2016, 10:18 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2015
|
[Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Combatant A takes his turn first and chooses the All-Out Attack maneuver. Combatant B dodges the attack. In his turn, can Combatant B also choose the All-Out Attack maneuver, considering he has used an active defense before his turn?
I'd say he can, since it wasn't his turn when he defended, but I'd just like to clear this up. It certainly favors those who act later when their opponents choose a maneuver that limits their own defenses. |
10-28-2016, 10:25 AM | #2 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Your turn doesn't start until it is your turn.
Going first benefits you because of shock penalties and the other effects of injury, as well as being able to take advantage of cover and positioning. Also if B AoAs, then he gets no defense on As next turn. |
10-28-2016, 11:03 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jul 2015
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Thanks, guys.
If you take into account that both combatants chose All-Out Attack in their first turns, B got an active defense against A, while A didn't get any defense at all. So B is standing better after the first turns. This tradeoff also applies to any maneuver that limits defenses, such as Committed Attack. But I'm okay with that. |
10-28-2016, 12:06 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ft Collins, CO
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Quote:
arnej |
|
10-28-2016, 01:03 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Quote:
It is that famous diagram: |--A1--|--A2--|--A3--| .....|--B1--|--B2--|--B3--| Combat starts. A1. A begins their turn and All-Out Attacks B...who hasn't started their first turn yet. B defends. B1. B begins their turn and All-Out Attacks. A, who is still in their first turn, cannot defend. A2. A ends their first turn and begins their second turn. A does a regular attack on B. B, who is still in their first turn, cannot defend. B2. B ends their first turn and begins their second turn. A does another All-Out Attack. B, who is still in their second turn, defends. So to disentangle. A All-Out Attacks on their first turn and is not able to defend that turn. B All-Out Attacks on their first turn and is not able to defend that turn. |
|
10-28-2016, 02:13 PM | #6 | |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Quote:
Edit to add: Basically, All-Out Attack should only be used when you're confident your opponent won't be able to retaliate, or when you can safely ignore any counterattack (e.g. You have enough armor to prevent any injury)
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. Last edited by RyanW; 10-28-2016 at 02:16 PM. |
|
10-29-2016, 03:11 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA, Arizona, Mesa
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
If you're worried about the system “favouring those who act later” then you need to really grok the Wait maneuver.
Take your example: Adam begins the combat by All-Out Attacking Bruce. Bruce responds by All-Out Attacking Adam. This superficially might favour Bruce. Now, what if Adam took a Wait maneuver to All-Out Attack when he saw Bruce initiate an All-Out Attack? Now the sequence is: Adam Waits, Bruce All-Out Attacks, Adam interrupts Bruce's All-Out Attack with his own All-Out Attack — and because Bruce is All-Out Attacking, he gets no defense. Their situations are exactly reversed, and the turn sequence now superficially favours Adam. It actually more than superficially favours whoever has the highest Basic Speed, because of the entire way the Wait maneuver works: if you have the highest Basic Speed, you can (theoretically) react at any point during the turn sequence: whatever point you consider most advantageous. |
10-29-2016, 03:59 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Regarding the advantage one might possess going second, Celti is correct; Wait should take care of that.
Regarding All-Out Attack, if your opponent might be able to retaliate after such an attack, it really is a poor decision. That's why Berserk is a disadvantage: it comes with some hefty defensive bonuses, but will they stop you from getting cut down while you can't defend yourself? Not necessarily. |
10-29-2016, 06:07 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Jul 2015
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Sure, there was never the doubt of whether All-Out Attack is a good maneuver to start a combat. My doubt was only about the turn sequence, which you guys tackled very well. Thank you all.
It might help to explain why all these crazy people are AoAing if you consider them to be unexperienced fighters. GURPS Martial Arts says they're likely to choose desperate maneuvers, such as AoA. |
10-29-2016, 12:49 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France
|
Re: [Basic Set] Question about turn sequence
Also note that if you want to play in a very realistic manner, when someone attacks, it can be hard to know if he is doing a normal or an all out attack.
I never tell to my players what maneuver their foes choose. I only describe them what they can see (The skeleton jumps and tries to strike your head with a vertical blow) ... Thus, combatant B can never be sure that A isn't able to defend himself after his attack. That avoid this kind of situation where choosing an all out attack becomes totally safe. Of course, if the player of an experienced warrior asks me: "Is it a normal or an all-out attack?", his character should have some chance to know it: he is experienced enough to guess it just by looking at the manner of attacking. So, in that case, I would secretly make a secret combat skill roll based on Perception and, if successful, I would tell him. But only if the roll is successful. |
Tags |
active defense, basic set, turn sequence |
|
|