08-31-2017, 10:36 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Replacing Self-Control rolls with Penalties
In 4e, influence rolls never directly force PC behavior. Instead, they apply a penalty to actions inconsistent with the influence (B359). Would it work to do the same thing for disadvantages -- say, 15- becomes a -1 penalty, 12- becomes a -2 penalty, 9- becomes a -4 penalty, 6- becomes a -8 penalty?
|
08-31-2017, 03:18 PM | #2 |
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Replacing Self-Control rolls with Penalties
Your numbers look pretty sound, but the trick is deciding which actions are relevant. Here's an example, from a few years ago:
I'm the infiltrator in a team of counter-intelligence agents. I also have Greed with a 12- self-control roll. I've entered the residence of some people who we're suspicious about and I'm searching for anything that might give us a clue as to what they're up to. Quite early on, I find a substantial sum in cash, not well hidden, enough to raise questions. I can see three courses of action. I could leave it there, since they'll probably check on it when they get back, but report it back to my commander. Second, I could take it, turn part of it in as evidence, and keep the rest. Third, I could take it for myself, and quite likely get away with it. The first course clearly requires a self-control roll (SCR) under normal rules. The second does, but might be a bit easier since I'm keeping something like three months' pay. The third doesn't, but has its own risks. If this variant is in use, if I don't take the money, I'm at -2 (for a 12- SCR). What does that penalty apply to? My further searches in that building? Stealth to avoid the suspects when they came back unexpectedly? Where's the boundary? An inverse of this idea might be more workable, giving a short-term bonus for waiving your self-control roll and just submitting to the disadvantage.
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
08-31-2017, 03:43 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Re: Replacing Self-Control rolls with Penalties
I'd think the penalty applies until the reason is gone. So as long as you are in the house with part of your concentration on "but there is that big pile of money just sitting there" you are at a penalty for being distracted.
|
08-31-2017, 04:22 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
|
Re: Replacing Self-Control rolls with Penalties
There's something along these lines in GURPS Action 1 (in the Disadvantage Limit box on p. 20): the player may choose to trigger a disadvantage (and accept a blanket penalty to actions based on its point value) for a particular action scene, and afterwards consider the disadvantage inactive for the rest of the session.
__________________
Podcast: Improvised Radio Theatre - With Dice Gaming stuff here: Tekeli-li! Blog; Webcomic Laager and Limehouse Buy things by me on Warehouse 23 |
08-31-2017, 04:31 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Replacing Self-Control rolls with Penalties
Various games have done this, but it usually means disadvantages should be assigned a value of 0.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|