03-30-2011, 04:03 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Proper Limitation to make Affliction a touch attack
Is it Contact Agent or Melee Attack (C range)? Both are -30% so I figure it doesn't "really" matter what the official answer is, but I'm curious which is "right" for this.
|
03-30-2011, 04:06 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
|
Re: Proper Limitation to make Affliction a touch attack
Melee reduces it to a touch attack.
Contact Agent can be applied to ranged or melee attacks, and requires that the attack hit bare skin. It is stopped by any DR that isn't Tough skin. You definitely don't want to use Contact Agent to represent a melee attack. |
03-30-2011, 04:16 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dobbstown Sane Asylum
|
Re: Proper Limitation to make Affliction a touch attack
Use Melee Attack to make it a touch-only attack. Then you also add Contact Agent (for a total of -60% or -65%) if you have to touch bare skin.
__________________
Reverend Pee Kitty of the Order Malkavian-Dobbsian (Twitter) (LJ) MyGURPS: My house rules and GURPS resources.
#SJGamesLive: I answered questions about GURPS After the End and more! {Watch Video} - {Read Transcript} |
03-30-2011, 04:27 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Re: Proper Limitation to make Affliction a touch attack
This is to emulate haveing to touch an object you are enchanting magically, so this sounds like Melee Attack (-30%), Contact Agent (-30%) and some sort of Accessiblity. I currently have the accessiblity set to -30% for "Properly crafted object. Does this sound right?
|
03-30-2011, 04:57 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Proper Limitation to make Affliction a touch attack
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
magic, powers, q&a, rev. pee kitty |
|
|