07-17-2018, 06:57 PM | #61 | ||
On Notice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sumter, SC
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Quote:
Spock knew of the intermix formula and stated "It's never been tested. It's a theoretical relationship between time and antimatter." After using the formula Spock comments: "This does open some intriguing prospects, Captain. Since the formula worked, we can go back in time, to any planet, any era." It was a desperate application of an already existing formula on standard warp drive engines not a one-time invention nor beyond the cutting edge of Federation tech. I don't think there is a canonal reason why it hasn't been used again. Quote:
Last edited by maximara; 07-17-2018 at 07:05 PM. |
||
07-17-2018, 09:10 PM | #62 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Quote:
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
07-17-2018, 09:11 PM | #63 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Didn't it take several days for a message to go from Vulcan (40 Eridani, about sixteen and a quarter lightyears, according to Roddenberry) to Earth and back during "Amok Time"? Kinda negates the idea of an interstellar Internet. (Not sure about Earth-to-Mars or Earth-to-Saturn internet, tho; that may be viable in near-realtime.)
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting Last edited by Phantasm; 07-17-2018 at 09:15 PM. |
07-17-2018, 09:21 PM | #64 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Quote:
Even if you allow some dramatic license about how quickly the message got there, it looks as if T'Pol got onto the communicator with Earth and asked for Kirk's arrival to be approved, and Starfleet made the decision and sent it back, with only minutes delay. Also, during Kirk's earlier conversation with the Admiral, there were no perceptible delays between their remarks.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
07-17-2018, 09:34 PM | #65 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
A tricorder is used for computing, recording, and sensing in Star Trek. It is a highly advanced computing device that is capable of basically every form of sensing known. It is a tiny computer (computing and recording functions) combined with an Ultrascanner (sensing function). The fact that the tricorder did the majority of the calculations without being asked just meant that the computer was very, very good.
|
07-17-2018, 10:02 PM | #66 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Quote:
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
07-17-2018, 11:41 PM | #67 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
|
07-18-2018, 12:00 AM | #68 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Does that equate to a claim that it has to convert signals from analog to digital and process the digital inputs? Or is this counting, say, a vacuum tube voltmeter as "computing" things by analog processes?
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
07-18-2018, 12:32 AM | #69 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Just to add to this, I got out my copy of UT and compared the show with it. In this, I'm going only by episodes of the original TV series that came on the air in 1966. I'm disregarding any technologies that count as superscience (such as warp drive, matter transmitters, and disintegration weapons), as canonically those could appear at any TL, and therefore having them is not strong evidence of being a particular TL. I'm not speculating about how we might now imagine something to be done or what we might believe to have to exist by implication; I'm going only by what was actually said or shown on the show.
TL9: ST: TOS lacks neural interfaces, mobile robots, and any significant use of body armor or powered exoskeleta. It has antimatter and uses in in space propulsion, and it has at least significant advances in bioscience. It has cheap access to orbit using SSTO shuttles; it doesn't seem to have space elevators. It no longer uses conventional firearms, and the listed TL9 energy weapons don't seem to be in use. TL10: There are no inexpensive sapient machines or microbot swarms. Life expectancy is not in multiple centuries. There is no evidence of living plastics. There definitely are power storage devices sufficient for handheld energy weapons. TL11: Products are not made out of inexpensively manufactured diamond, and there is no mention of artificial exotic materials. Antimatter is not used for small-scale energy storage. There isn't anything as advanced as a chrysalis machine, nor can minds be copied. There are powerful beam weapons, the phaser being the obvious case. TL12: There are no machines for imprinting consciousness into human brains. It doesn't appear that there are simple pills that can regenerate the human body; too many red shirts die of fairly simple injuries. Society does not appear to be run by intelligent machines, and there is no meaningful integration of living and mechanical beings. ST: TOS certainly isn't breaking up gas giants for raw materials! Given this, it seems to me that quite a few TL9 and TL10 inventions are in common use. The only TL11 technology seems to be powerful beam weapons (photon torpedoes and ship's phasers). There don't seem to be the miracle technologies of TL12 at all. A lot of technology would be behind the scenes, and the most we can say is that there's not overt evidence for it. My guess would be TL10; TL 11 isn't inconceivable, but less likely; TL12 is right out. On the other hand, TL9 is clearly in ST's past. There appear to be significant elements of emergent superscience, some earlier than UT's suggestions for their appropriate TLs. There also are scientists and engineers who can make major breakthroughs singlehanded.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
07-18-2018, 05:25 AM | #70 | ||||
On Notice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sumter, SC
|
Re: What TL is the original Star Trek?
Quote:
Quote:
I should mention that TL12^ it is ridiculous as any TL can be connected to the superscience label so having a number there really serves no purpose. GURPS BioTech realized this and just uses the "^". Quote:
Quote:
People keep trying to blow off this key element regarding Star Trek Tech from "A Piece of the Action" as 'comedy' but they forget that Spock is in on that conversion and in his own words (in another episode) 'he never jokes'. So Kirk is trying to make light of what is a totally viable possibility. “An ancestor of mine maintained that if you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the solution." - Spock. Ergo the Federation in TOS cannot be any higher then TL9 otherwise a TL6 culture could not duplicate Federation tech. (barring any Wildcard skills and there is nothing to suggest the Iotians have those.) Remember it took the Iotians a full century, even with books with TL6 information, to go from TL5 to TL6. This time around all they have is one piece of tech. Yet that one piece of tech can put them on par with the Federation "in a few years". Remember the Iotians are bright and imitative; they got to the world described in Chicago Mobs of the Twenties and stopped in terms of culture and technology. This points to TOS being TL(6+3)^ perhaps TL(7+2)^ (transtator TL6^ Medicine: TL7^) All transtator based tech is TL6^ with the rest TL(6+3)^ or TL(7+2)^ . Last edited by maximara; 07-18-2018 at 05:46 AM. |
||||
|
|