12-09-2009, 08:49 AM | #1 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
Bill Stoddard |
|
12-09-2009, 07:05 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind You!
|
Re: Is Transhuman Space a "silly" genre?
I tend to think that the thing we call "identity" is a whole mishmash of different things which for us all go together, but THS level tech starts to seperate into different things.
__________________
Patrick Ley "If your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you." --Mal in "Our Own Mrs. Reynolds" Firefly |
12-09-2009, 07:22 PM | #3 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Is Transhuman Space a "silly" genre?
Quote:
[Edit]Okay, this post was actually supposed to be more about the THS setting and its seriousness, but no harm done.[/edit] Last edited by vicky_molokh; 12-09-2009 at 07:59 PM. |
|
12-09-2009, 08:02 PM | #4 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Furthermore, when the backup is activated it will have no awareness of having escaped danger. As a means of escaping death, backup mindscans are not even good psychology, let alone good metaphysics. I wouldn't expect many people to use them unless they are very cheap.
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
12-09-2009, 08:09 PM | #5 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: Is Transhuman Space a "silly" genre?
Sound metaphysical position. The answers to all metaphysical questions depend wholly on the definitions chosen, and different definitions are suitable for different purposes.
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
12-09-2009, 08:31 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
The Problem of Identity in THS
Quote:
I recommend the book The Mind's I, which is a collection of profound and amusing writings on the metaphysics of identity and consciousness by various authors taking different positions, assembled and with reflections by Douglas Hofstadter and Daniel Dennett. It's a good read, not too heavy, and very much on topic for Transhuman Space
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. Last edited by Agemegos; 12-09-2009 at 08:37 PM. |
|
12-09-2009, 08:58 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Is Transhuman Space a "silly" genre?
Quote:
Grammatically, qualitative identity is represented by common nouns: I am a human being, I am a libertarian, I am a GURPS player. Numerical identity is represented by proper nouns: I am Bill Stoddard. Much of what happens in discussion of this topic is attempts to turn proper nouns into common nouns, so that being-a-particular-individual is equated with being-an-entity-of-a-particular-kind. This is encouraged in THS, of course, by the postulated available of cheap, easy copying methods for (certain) sapient beings. But there's a different question that's attached to this, which is that of the persistence of viewpoint. This is, if not a subjective question, a question of the nature of subjectivity as such, of what it is to have a subjective viewpoint. The question seems to attach to the question of numerical identity: If we envision individual A at time 1 and individual B at time 2 as having the same subjective viewpoint, then we envision A and B as being the same individual. So "the same" attaches to the question of what we mean when we say that there is continuity of viewpoint. Does that seem to capture the crucial issues? Bill Stoddard |
|
12-09-2009, 09:17 PM | #8 |
Join Date: May 2008
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
This is certainly an interesting subject. I'm having a bit of trouble with Mr. Stoddard's viewpoint though. Could you explain what numerical identity is, exactly? In physical, rather than linguistic, terms, that is.
|
12-09-2009, 09:39 PM | #9 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Is Transhuman Space a "silly" genre?
Quote:
It's also important to remember that people accepts breaks of continuity as not being able to destroy an identity (my father after stroke is still my father etc.). That's in addition to the fact that Vick-1984 and Vick-2009 have less in common than two xoxes from the same minute. |
|
12-09-2009, 10:44 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Ghosts and Mind Copies - The Identity Question
Quote:
When I go to a game, and take out my copy of GURPS Powers, and some of my players take out their copies, and they are borrowed by players who don't own copies, and at the end, I ask, "Is this my copy?"—I'm asking about numerical identity. They're all copies of the same book, so they all have the same qualitatitive identity. But each copy has a different numerical identity. In some cases, they might have subtle differences that do not change their qualitative identity; for example, my copy is autographed by Steve Jackson. In others, if it mattered, we could create such differences to keep track of which was whose copy: I could put a red tag on mine, and my players could put other tags on theirs. In still other cases, we might not have such signs to refer to, but if we had videotaped the session, a careful examination of the videotape could reveal that each book followed a distinct timelike path through space-time. But even if we didn't do that, and had no way of telling which book was whose, it would not happen that my book, which was being read by JPS, and JT's book, which was being read by MB, who was sitting next to JPS, would suddenly change numerical identities, so that it would be JT's book in JPS's hands and my book in MB's hands. Numerical identity of macroscopic objects does not hop around like that. Bill Stoddard |
|
Tags |
verhängnisthread |
|
|