Armor Divisor Stacking

GWJ · 01-26-2019, 01:18 PM

Does Armor Divisor stacks, or it's just highest of them which counts? If stacks - how? Armor Divisor (3) and Armor Divisor (2) = Armor Divisor (3x2=6)?

Stripe · 01-26-2019, 02:39 PM

You are correct. They are multiplicative.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PK

You should multiply the armor divisors together. A (2) stacked with a (3) becomes a (6).

~~evileeyore~~ · 01-26-2019, 04:19 PM

Technically you're supposed to apply them separately*... but I don't see that as being any different than just multiplying them and then applying it.

* Kromm quote.

ArchonShiva · 01-26-2019, 07:47 PM

This also means if you rather say it goes 2-3-5-etc. or whatever, there’s no serious balance issue there.

Kromm · 01-28-2019, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evileeyore

Technically you're supposed to apply them separately*... but I don't see that as being any different than just multiplying them and then applying it.

* Kromm quote.

Well, "divide twice" is mathematically the same as "multiply once and then divide by the product." There's no difference at all between (DR/a)/b and DR/(a⋅b); it's two operations either way and they yield the same result. But the idea is that if you have divisors, they apply arithmetically, not as shifts on a chart.

01-26-2019, 01:18 PM	#1
GWJ Join Date: Mar 2013	Armor Divisor Stacking Does Armor Divisor stacks, or it's just highest of them which counts? If stacks - how? Armor Divisor (3) and Armor Divisor (2) = Armor Divisor (3x2=6)?

01-26-2019, 04:19 PM	#3
~~evileeyore~~ Banned Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: 100 hurricane swamp	Re: Armor Divisor Stacking Technically you're supposed to apply them separately... but I don't see that as being any different than just multiplying them and then applying it. Kromm quote. Last edited by evileeyore; 01-26-2019 at 04:24 PM.

01-26-2019, 07:47 PM	#4
ArchonShiva Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Montréal, Québec	Re: Armor Divisor Stacking This also means if you rather say it goes 2-3-5-etc. or whatever, there’s no serious balance issue there. __________________ Per-based Stealth isn’t remotely as awkward as DX-based Observation.