01-22-2019, 02:31 PM | #51 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
A balloon pops if the pressure difference between inside and outside exceeds the strength of the balloon. Put 1 atmosphere of pressure inside a balloon in space and it almost certainly pops, but there's no reason to do that, it will inflate just fine with much less pressure. |
|
01-22-2019, 02:33 PM | #52 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
The decoys would need the same mass as a real warhead in order to properly mimic their orbits*. Forcing replacement of a real warhead with a decoy counts as an automatic warhead kill for the defense. If the defense is less than 100% accurate, the offense might as well throw 2 warheads as 1 warhead and 1 decoy. If the decoys mass far less than a real warhead, then you can discriminate them and ignore them (which means they were wasted space, and again might as well be replaced with a real warhead).
-- * I can remember claims from the old SDI arguments about drag and cross-sectional density and momentum, or observing recoil from a relatively low-powered probe pulse, for instance. (One counterargument is of course that the defense might as well go ahead and fry the decoys, too. Why not -- unless you assume some limitations on the defense such as ammunition or tracking or RoF limits in the time available.) One-sentence bullet point arguments like these conceal a great many assumptions, rather than being universal truths. |
01-22-2019, 02:44 PM | #53 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
After the launch phase you'll be in atmosphere thin enough that atmospheric drag should be moot (and interactions with the solar wind might be below detection threshold, or maskable somehow). Being shot down during launch would be a problem, though if there's only one laser platform it's likely the actual launch will occur on the far side of the planet.
|
01-22-2019, 02:55 PM | #54 | |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
Any discussion you can point to on that star? from my reading, mylar balloons released from an IMBC aren't just an extant technology, they seem to be a standard technology and if there is an easy way to distinguish them from nukes in space, it doesn't show up in a shallow internet search. If you have negligible atmospheric interference and you don't maneuver the objects, the mass of the orbiting object doesn't matter. Those are two strict requirements, and put a lot of constraints on what you can do, but I never said this was an attempt to hit them. The purpose of such an action is to divert resources away from figuring out where you're hiding your tanks, ammo depots, troops, and so forth. And if they don't respect the threat, maybe I will get a hit in. If you have some time to do R&D first, you can make course corrections on the far side of the planet, where the aliens can't see how big the burn on each object is. Unless they have satellites stationed all over the globe . In which case you've got targets you can fight more fairly.
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
|
01-22-2019, 03:58 PM | #55 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
The problem though is that the spacecraft can just get out of the way (and the decoys are going to spread away from the warheads over 30,000 km of travel unless they also have rockets and guidance systems).
|
01-23-2019, 01:54 AM | #56 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
If you calculate that over the time of the attack, the opposition can shoot down 1000 targets, and you have 500 missiles, replacing 10 warheads with 1000 decoys you will be attacking with 1490 targets, of which 490 will be actual warheads. Chances are some will get through. Quote:
|
||
01-23-2019, 02:13 AM | #57 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
Quote:
That is not true of MIRV missiles, which maneuver to release each individual reentry vehicle on a new course. But of course, in this case (with one target) each MIRV missile can be programmed to work just as a MRV missile, firing all individual warheads together on a pattern-making course. Then the individual warheads would also be simply on a ballistic course. The only warheads that would be clearly distinguishable from ballistically moving decoys are the MaRVs, which are maneuverable. I say, fire those too, if any are still on inventory. Last edited by Michele; 01-23-2019 at 02:38 AM. |
||
01-23-2019, 02:44 AM | #58 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
I just realized that each ICBM available actually could be modified, if there's the time to do that, to carry more payload.
Because a sizable part of the weight of each warhead is the reentry shield that is necessary because of the attrition with the atmosphere, while going down towards a ground target. With a target in space, the shielding can be significantly reduced and that weight can be taken up by small-sized stuff that can be shaped to take its place, such as chaff packages or more small kinetic projectiles. Once the warhead is on its terminal course, the thinned-down shielding opens up and disperses the additional stuff. |
01-23-2019, 03:19 AM | #59 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
01-23-2019, 04:23 AM | #60 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
|
Re: Orbital Lasers
Quote:
|
|
|
|