08-24-2013, 07:48 AM | #21 | ||
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
Thank you, it bugs me when people get those confused. The principle difference between the two is that a clip holds bullets, while a magazine holds bullets AND feeds them into the chamber, usually using a spring. Some magazines will accept a clip, others will not. Magazines may also be integral to the weapon, but I cannot think of any that have an integral clip. Quote:
|
||
08-24-2013, 12:47 PM | #22 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Yeah. While a "tactical" reload of a weapon while it still has a round in the chamber is going to be slightly quicker than a full reload when it does not, the difference is going to be very small: the amount of time it takes to release the bolt/slide or, worst case, to fully cycle the weapon. The difference is probably below resolution.
As for pulling a magazine while still shooting, it would be rather harder than just losing the benefits of a second hand on the weapon. That's a lot of movement and some concentration on an extra maneuver. Even if I were to allow such a combination (And I wouldn't, short of possibly using it as an explanation for Fast Draw (Ammo)), it would have a penalty for doing two things at once. I can certainly say that I've never once seen someone perform such an action. Even in speed-shooting trials, where shaving a fraction of a second off of reload times can make a huge deal, I've never seen anyone pull a fresh magazine out before they've completely emptied their weapon. |
08-24-2013, 02:12 PM | #23 | |
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
But I wanted to include the usual reloading procedure fully in these actions. Anyway, you COULD still do it that way, losing the round in the chamber during the process... ;-) |
|
08-24-2013, 02:26 PM | #24 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
08-24-2013, 02:32 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
Guns like the Garand and the C96 had a magazine that was a permanent part of the gun and was loaded using clips. When guns with detachable magazines were developed the correct term became ambiguous. Yes, it is part of the feed system like a magazine is but it's also the thing I use to reload my gun, and that object has always been called a clip. Indeed modern detachable magazines serve the purpose both of a clip and of a magazine. It didn't take long to settle on magazine as the official term, however. |
|
08-24-2013, 04:01 PM | #26 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down in a holler
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
Quote:
M95 Steyr Mannlicher. |
||
08-24-2013, 08:16 PM | #27 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
|
08-24-2013, 08:52 PM | #28 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down in a holler
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
necessary to make a whole complete; essential or fundamental. The magazine of either rifle will not function without a clip inserted so..... |
|
08-24-2013, 09:21 PM | #29 | |
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Smacked myself in the head over that one. I don't speak that way, not sure why I typed it.
Quote:
FWIW, the clip on the M1 is not strictly integral either - there are devices that can be used in place of the clip, preventing the normal stripping of bullets from the magazine and allowing for single rounds to be fired. And since these devices are not themselves clips AND still allow the weapon to function, I would say that the clip is not therefore integral for the weapon. And I think the M95 will fire single shot without the clip without a SLED, so really the clip is only necessary for semi-automatic operation. |
|
08-24-2013, 09:41 PM | #30 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down in a holler
|
Re: Gun Ammo Confusion
Quote:
http://www.foundry.ray-vin.com/m1sled/m1sled.htm Quote:
In any case, the M1 and the M95 are examples of firearms which require a loaded clip to be inserted in order for the magazine to be functional. |
||
Tags |
high-tech, reloading |
|
|