04-23-2016, 01:15 PM | #21 | |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Quote:
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
|
04-23-2016, 01:44 PM | #22 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Quote:
You might just as well say that everything is language. If you know the symbolism that's used to describe stuff then obviously you know the stuff. . . .
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
04-23-2016, 03:32 PM | #23 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Quote:
It's just that even on real world earth, life includes some really weird chemistry like extremophiles thriving in pH below 1, and above 10, using oxidizers other than oxygen, etc. In alien/alternate reality worlds, the possibilites really start covering what everyone here implies fits general Chemistry. If so, then would those no longer fit Biology? Sorry if my failure to understand what seems near obvious to everyone else.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
04-23-2016, 03:53 PM | #24 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not sure what you're thinking the boundary between biochemistry and chemistry is, but I don't think there's much risk of exotic biologies approaching it. Even very exotic life almost certainly will be built around some kind of complex macromolecules that perform catalytic, control, and structural roles. That's what biochemists would study. What the particular composition or of those macromolecules is really has nothing to do with defining the skill.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
||
04-23-2016, 06:21 PM | #25 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
It might help me understand things if people used examples of what in setting feats would require one or the other.
What killed this guy would fall under Biochemistry regardless of the actual toxin, right? Lab production of substance X would fall under Chemistry unless it's specifically via coaxing living organisms, right?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
04-23-2016, 06:57 PM | #26 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
"What killed this guy" in the context of chemicals would be Poisons. RAW gives a default to Chemistry there, as well as Pharmacy and Physician. You might allow a Biochem default as well. Forensics is going to be useful to get to the point where you would suspect a poison, as might Surgery for an autopsy.
For lab production of Substance X, it would depend on what Substance X was. A biochemist might be better at synthesizing an enzyme, hormone, DNA, etc, than an inorganic chemist. There's also Bioengineering if you're planning on mass producing (say) insulin from genetically engineered bacteria. Biochem is concerned with molecules that are important in living organisms: lipids, carbohydrates -> polymers like cellulose, starch, glycogen; amino acids -> proteins; nucleotides -> RNA / DNA. The lower boundary here crosses over with organic chemistry. The upper boundary crosses over with cellular biology (membranes and their transport mechanisms, construction of organelles) and molecular biology (DNA transcription, protein synthesis and folding). Organic chemistry is carbon chemistry, which isn't necessarily tied to living biochemical systems (though once upon at time that was the main known source of such compounds; hence the name). Hydrocarbons, alkanes and carbon rings, alkenes, alkynes, alcohols, aromatics (benzene, etc), carbonyl compounds, stereochemistry, chirality and enantiomers, isomers. RAW tucks Biochem under Biology, which fits with a number of university department organizations (UC Berkeley, for one). I wouldn't expect many biologists to know a lot of biochem, so an optional specialty may be a bit generous. But in most games, that won't really come up a lot. Just as realistic warriors have more than one weapon skill, realistic scientists have more than one science skill. A biochemist studied inorganic and organic chem at some point, and probably even remembers some of it in addition to the part that's not directly relevant to biochem. An inorganic chemist is going to have heard of sucrose, even if that's really important to biochemists. There aren't hard walls between the disciplines. Rather than try to pigeonhole every topic into exactly one skill, you'd probably be better off with a sliding scale of familiarity penalties. |
04-23-2016, 08:29 PM | #27 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Quote:
In practice, there are a lot of tasks where I would allow a roll against either chem or biochem, and possibly also forensics, or poisons, or something else. And I'd mostly improvise my answers rather than try to work them out ahead of time. But I think that's partly because I read enough about the history of the sciences so I'm comfortable making stuff up for them.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
04-23-2016, 09:00 PM | #28 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Okay, I think I got it now. Thanks everybody.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
04-24-2016, 09:05 AM | #29 | |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Land of Enchantment
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
I was a BS in biochemistry before going to medical school.
Biochemistry isn't very much about chemistry, per se. You need chemistry to learn it, but then it is it's own highly specialized thing involving enzymes, proteins, hormones, ribosomes, vitamins, etc. Most of what you learn in biochemistry classes isn't at all like chemistry classes- you are assumed to know the basics of that already. What the biochem classes teach you is more practical information (the best word I can think of). Mostly, it is learning a crapton of, well, biochemistry. Huh. So what is biochemistry? The best example I can give would be to look at this gigantic diagram. At the end of Biochem 102 being able to draw this from memory is expected of any biochemist. Not literally, but yes you had better know everything on it. It is a huge diagram of all of the most important biosynthetic pathways in a cell- essentially, the Krebs cycle and everything that feeds into it, plus you need to know how DNA and RNA synthesis works (ribosomes, etc.). Bear in mind, as I said, this is Biochem 101 and 102. This is the baseline that you need to learn more biochemistry. This is junior year, after basic chemistry and organic chemistry your freshman and sophomore years. Or, it's also covered in one semester of medical school the first year. I was really glad that I knew it already. A chemist will know organic chemistry but probably not biochemistry (they're different) unless some project led him to learn a bit. He'd be able to figure out how to make a given organic molecule (i.e. urea or vitamin C or, hell, succinate) in a reactor, but he/she isn't really the guy to figure out how frex that sewer reek produces it's acid. Organic chemistry is the chemistry of organic molecules, but biochemistry is how they are actually synthesized and used in living things. There are a lot of organic molecules that would simply not be practical to synthesize in a purely chemical reactor- it's much easier to use a bioreactor. Quote:
I hope this has been helpful.
__________________
I'd need to get a grant and go shoot a thousand goats to figure it out. Last edited by acrosome; 04-24-2016 at 09:34 AM. |
|
04-24-2016, 11:28 AM | #30 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Biology:Biochemistry vs. Chemistry
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius |
||
Tags |
biochemestry, science |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|