10-21-2010, 12:32 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Japan
|
[HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
According to High-Tech (p. 65), metal armor (mail, scale, plate, etc.) made with TL5+ steel and machining has either (a) twice the DR for the same cost and weight or (b) the same DR for half the weight and cost.
(a) How does this doubling interact with Hardened Steel and Duplex Plate options (Low-Tech, p. 110)? Also, how does it affect the "DR -X vs. specific damage type" properties of various armors? Example: TL4 Light Plate torso armor gets +1 DR by adopting Hardened Steel (+4 CF), for the total of DR 4. Does the TL5 version of this armor get DR (base 3) * (2 for TL) + (1 for Hardened Steel) = DR 7, or DR (base 3 + 1 for Hardened Steel) * (2 for TL) = DR 8? Or is TL5 armor forbidden to have the Hardened Steel option because it's already made of steel? Then, what if I enhance my TL5 plate armor with Duplex Plate? And what CF do they have at TL5? Example: TL2 Light Mail has DR 3, but suffers -2 DR vs. crushing damage. Then, against crushing attacks, does the TL5 version of this armor get DR (base 3) * (2 for TL) - (2 for crushing) = DR 4, or DR (base 3 - 2 for crushing) * (2 for TL) = DR 2? What if I add the Banded Mail option (Low-Tech, p. 107)? (b) Does this halving mean that at TL5 we have an option that gives -0.5 CF and -50% weight, or does this halve the final weight and cost? Example: If a TL5 version of Light Plate torso armor (base $1,000) is enhanced with Expert Tailoring (Low-Tech, p. 110; +5 CF and -15% weight), does it have $5,500 and 2.8 lbs. (+5 CF plus -0.5 CF; -15% plus -50%) or $3,000 and 3.4 lbs. (+5 CF and then *0.5; -15% and then *0.5)?
__________________
Gurps Fan, a rules lawyer from the mysterious country of ninja, samurai, and magical girls, the inventor of M.U.N.C.H.K.I.N. |
10-21-2010, 01:05 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
I wouldn't allow the rule in High Tech to kick in until TL6. At TL5 I'd allow hardened steel to be purchased at regular prices and I'd allow regular plate to be purchased at cheap prices.
|
10-21-2010, 02:06 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Japan
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
Thank you for the reply, Dan-sensei. But, actually, I'm planning to introduce modern-material versions -- made of steel or titanium -- of old-fashioned armor into my TL8 campaign.
__________________
Gurps Fan, a rules lawyer from the mysterious country of ninja, samurai, and magical girls, the inventor of M.U.N.C.H.K.I.N. |
10-21-2010, 11:32 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
Un-alloyed, titanium is about as strong as low-grade steel and 45% lighter; it would be less of an improvement relative to higher grade steels (bulletproof titanium-alloy plates are more like 25-30% lighter than equivalent steel plates).
|
10-21-2010, 11:44 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Japan
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
Sorry, but I'm aware of that and I used the word "titanium" in the same sense as High-Tech. See the High-Tech Low-Tech box on p. 65 of High-Tech, which lists "titanium" as an armor option available at TL8.
__________________
Gurps Fan, a rules lawyer from the mysterious country of ninja, samurai, and magical girls, the inventor of M.U.N.C.H.K.I.N. |
10-21-2010, 03:36 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Albuquerque
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
a) I am not familiar with it, but since you get double DR, armor made of "hardened" TL5 materials would be (3*2)+1 in this case. I wouldn't get too hung up on the materials since GURPS is more of a flavor-oriented game. If they meant for it to be specific, they would make the notation. (usually) You double the base and then add the modifier. Now, you could consider scaling the bonus, based upon tens of DR, so 20 DR yields +2 DR for being "hardened", 30DR +3 DR ...
In example 2, I would follow the GURPS Basic, saying its DR3, or DR1 vs Crushing for being flexible, and then double that to DR6 or DR2. (Since that standard already exists and is just mentioned for ease in the LT apparently) I am unfamiliar with the Banded mail option, but I would apply the same litmus test and see if there are other instances of your examples already in the book. b) I would halve the weight and cost of the final weight/cost because the reductions in cost are designed to represent advances in manufacturing technique and materials. |
10-21-2010, 08:35 PM | #7 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Japan
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
Quote:
Quote:
Sounds reasonable.
__________________
Gurps Fan, a rules lawyer from the mysterious country of ninja, samurai, and magical girls, the inventor of M.U.N.C.H.K.I.N. |
||
10-22-2010, 02:25 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
|
10-22-2010, 03:07 AM | #9 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Japan
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
Quote:
And can we safely say that TL6+ steel armors have the doubled DR for +0 CF, and have the listed -- non-doubled -- DR if modified with the Cheap option (-0.6 CF, but no "DR -1")?
__________________
Gurps Fan, a rules lawyer from the mysterious country of ninja, samurai, and magical girls, the inventor of M.U.N.C.H.K.I.N. |
|
10-22-2010, 09:29 AM | #10 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vermont, USA
|
Re: [HT vs. LT?] TL5+ versions of TL4- metal armor
So ... all mutually exclusive:
Duplex Plate (TL4): +1 DR, -10% weight, +8 CF. Hardened Steel (TL4): +1 DR, +4 CF. Duplex Plate (TL5): +1 DR, -10% weight, +4 CF. Hardened Steel (TL5): +1 DR, +0 CF. Efficient-Manufacturing Steel (TL5): no changes, -0.6 CF. Machined Steel (TL6): ×2 DR or ×1/2 weight, +0 CF. Titanium (TL8): ×1/3 weight, +4 CF. |
|
|