11-08-2018, 12:27 PM | #31 |
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Personally, the only real problem I have with skill costs is that there is no difference in cost between getting my skill from 1 above Att to 10 above Att. It's the same cost, even though the effort needed to increase ones ability that far above, IMHO, should definitely cost more.
We are discussing in our game that skills cost up to Att is per normal and for every rank above Att costs 1 CP more than normal (Att+1 costs 1 more, Att +2 costs 2 more, etc), though this is still in the discussion stage ATM. As for Att over Skill, IMHO, it's up to the GM to set the rules and regulations in game. Our GM is starting her campaign with an Att limit of 14 to start and Skill limit of 16. We are using KTOS and options discussed by Kromm (and others) on a thread(s) about more realistic characters (don't have the link ATM but can post later if anyone is interested) so all attributes are going to be soft capped at 15 and hard capped at 16. Skills will be capped at Att +10 (though I doubt anyone will ever even try to get that high) We discussed at length before character creation what was expected from attributes and skills. We were all agreed that attributes were not going to be touched often as skills are what most people get better at, regardless of the mathematical cost effectiveness. On option it to just make attributes harder to increase, not necessarily more expensive. A guideline mentioned in the book is approximately 200 hrs. of training per CP (though we use this mostly in reverse...200 hrs of training will get you 1 CP). Make it where attributes take 1000 hrs. or some other in-game mechanical hoops that have to jumped through to make Skills a much more attractive option even though it would be more "efficient" to raise an attribute. Personally I think there is a big difference between "efficiency" and munchkin-math. |
11-08-2018, 12:29 PM | #32 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
If the rules system is such that it's less efficient pointwise to build a character whose skill greatly exceeds the primary stat it's based on, such characters will be comparatively rare. Since I tend to think such characters are usually implausible, I think their being rare is a good thing. For example, in my hypothetical case, the rule I propose would mean that a character with IQ 8 could have Chemistry-8 for 4 points, Chemistry-9 for 8, Chemistry-10 for 16, Chemistry-11 for 32, and Chemistry-12 for 64. Going to IQ 9 and Chemistry-12 would save 12 points, and would be much more likely; going to IQ 10 and Chemistry-12 would cost 4 points, which could probably be made up easily by the gains to other skills. So nearly all professional chemists would have IQ 10 or above. I think that makes better sense.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
11-08-2018, 12:30 PM | #33 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: OK
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
Players will treat character points as a measure of usefulness. Traits that give more usefulness for a point spent will be incentivized, and traits that give less usefulness will be disincentivized. This is obvious if you imagine increasing or decreasing the cost of traits. If Combat Reflexes, for instance, cost forty-five points rather than fifteen, it would be less useful relative to the other options available for forty-five points. Opportunity costs are a thing. By making something cost more, you disincentivize people from taking it. Is the idea to disincentivize people from making characters with high skill levels relative to their attributes?
__________________
"For the rays, to speak properly, are not colored. In them there is nothing else than a certain power and disposition to stir up a sensation of this or that color." —Isaac Newton, Optics My blog. |
|
11-08-2018, 01:18 PM | #34 |
Join Date: Jul 2013
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
I solved alot of the problem by putting a cap on the attributes. You can only be so good at them, before you have to start focusing on skills.
__________________
My GURPS Blog: https://omniversalmess.blogspot.com/ |
11-08-2018, 01:20 PM | #35 | ||
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not taking a position in this discussion, other than that I don't find the existing skill and technique rules annoying very often. My posting was just offering an explanation about the relationship between character point cost and the representation of the world.
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
||
11-08-2018, 01:21 PM | #36 |
Join Date: Jan 2017
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
If Attributes are capped, skills aren't too expensive at all.
Techniques are way too expensive though. If you want techniques to be used, one way around this is to simply have 'technique points' to go along with regular character points. They could be earned at the same rate, or they could be earned through successful technique use. |
11-08-2018, 02:01 PM | #37 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: OK
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
All you need to do is go look up children playing piano on YouTube to see lots of people with below-average intelligence who have studied a difficult skill. The way humans become good at a skill is through practicing that skill. You can find countless children who have practiced and gotten good at a skill. As GURPS would have it, children have below-average intelligence. This isn't how I would choose to model things. I think a learning disability should be its own separate thing. But if we're treating below-average intelligence as the default mental state of children, then it shouldn't cost more per level for my child character to know piano than it does for your adult character. It doesn't make any sense to me that I should have to pay more points per level to know piano because I chose to play as a child. I'm struggling to understand what reasoning could support the rules charging those prices.
__________________
"For the rays, to speak properly, are not colored. In them there is nothing else than a certain power and disposition to stir up a sensation of this or that color." —Isaac Newton, Optics My blog. |
|
11-08-2018, 02:22 PM | #38 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
11-08-2018, 02:36 PM | #39 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
|
|
11-08-2018, 02:36 PM | #40 | |
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: OK
|
Re: Skills and Techniques are too expensive
Quote:
If I'm understanding you correctly, your goal is to encourage players to make characters who match your understanding of the sorts of people real world learning produces? You believe that real world people who end up being good at one mental skill tend to be good at doing mental skills in general, and the game rules should encourage you to build those sorts of characters, rather than having a pianist who is good at piano but not good at painting or surgery or mathematics, or similar types of characters. Am I kind of getting where you're coming from?
__________________
"For the rays, to speak properly, are not colored. In them there is nothing else than a certain power and disposition to stir up a sensation of this or that color." —Isaac Newton, Optics My blog. |
|
|
|