Restraining order question

Dark_0n3 · 03-21-2012, 10:35 PM

So lets say two players are in combat (A and B - helper). Player C wants to use a card to hurt player A: lets say a curse or even any card to backstab him. Player A uses Restraining Order card and player C takes his card back. He now uses the same card on player B instead and claims it's a cards to hurt player B, not player A. What is the ruling in this case?

Clipper · 03-21-2012, 11:20 PM

In this thread, MunchkinMan ruled that Restraining Order would not stop you interfering with the helper provided the helper is the only munchkin you interfere with.

Anything that affects the monsters or is used to hurt the munchkin side is definitely out, but it seems you would be able to use a curse or use the Thief's backstab on the helper.

03-21-2012, 10:35 PM	#1
Dark_0n3 Join Date: Dec 2011	Restraining order question So lets say two players are in combat (A and B - helper). Player C wants to use a card to hurt player A: lets say a curse or even any card to backstab him. Player A uses Restraining Order card and player C takes his card back. He now uses the same card on player B instead and claims it's a cards to hurt player B, not player A. What is the ruling in this case?

03-21-2012, 11:20 PM	#2
Clipper Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia	Re: Restraining order question In this thread, MunchkinMan ruled that Restraining Order would not stop you interfering with the helper provided the helper is the only munchkin you interfere with. Anything that affects the monsters or is used to hurt the munchkin side is definitely out, but it seems you would be able to use a curse or use the Thief's backstab on the helper.