Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2011, 08:45 AM   #41
ajardoor
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

It should be noted that the Fallout universe has anarchronistic super-science, like ray guns, super computers that use vacuum tubes and no micro-processors and drugs that work instantly and with potent effects.

Yeah, the exact tech level is probably TL6+2^, with some lower TL societies here and there.
__________________
My blog: http://tabletoprpg333.home.blog
ajardoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 10:31 AM   #42
David Johnston2
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajardoor View Post
It should be noted that the Fallout universe has anarchronistic super-science, like ray guns, super computers that use vacuum tubes and no micro-processors and drugs that work instantly and with potent effects.

Yeah, the exact tech level is probably TL6+2^, with some lower TL societies here and there.
Between the power armour, the combat drugs, the automobile engines that don't require gasoline, the plasma weapon and so forth Fallout is quite a bit higher than that, but this isn't relevant since the OP didn't ask for for an adaptation of Fallout.
David Johnston2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 10:22 PM   #43
fredtheobviouspseudonym
 
Join Date: May 2007
Default Couple of prospects:

1.) Why the long term seal-up?

I'd favor biological warfare gone very wrong indeed. See Gruinard Island & the anthrax experiments there in 1942. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruinard_Island

Years ago, I read an account of a 1973 exchange between military writer (and then Master Gunner of the Royal Army) Ian Hogg and a British biological warfare researcher. Hogg basically opined that the advent of nuclear weapons had made bio-war pretty tame stuff. The reply?

"We've got stuff that makes the H-bomb look like a wet firecracker."

And that was in 1973 (give or take a couple of years.) What happens when you throw effective recombination DNA engineering into the mix? [Yeah, I know that bio-war research as been outlawed for years. Officially. How often will ALL the governments of the planet obey such a ban?]

". . . after the biological warfare trials had ended, initial efforts to decontaminate the island failed due to the high durability of anthrax spores. For many years, it was judged too hazardous and expensive to decontaminate the island sufficiently to allow public access. As a result, Gruinard Island was quarantined indefinitely. Visits to the island were prohibited, except periodic checks by Porton Down personnel to determine the current level of contamination."

"Starting in 1986 a determined effort was made to decontaminate the island, with 280 tonnes of formaldehyde solution diluted in seawater being sprayed over all 196 hectares of the island and the worst-contaminated topsoil around the dispersal site being removed. A flock of sheep was then placed on the island and remained healthy. On April 24, 1990, after 48 years of quarantine, junior defence minister Michael Neubert visited the island and announced its safety by removing the warning signs." From the Wikipedia article; seems to fit the other stuff I've seen.

So 1942 level anthrax spores were able to contaminate an island for nearly 50 years. How long do you want?

2.) I'd propose that 20 million is a bit large for any realistic bio-ark population. IIRC at one point in prehistory the entire human species was some 2 to 5000 souls, and recovered from that point. Perhaps with modern genetics we could have some tens of thousands at least APPEAR a viable population?
fredtheobviouspseudonym is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 11:23 PM   #44
Daigoro
 
Daigoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meifumado
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

I was thinking a massive solar flare could be a good plot device to scare people underground. It would be transient to whatever degree needed, predictable enough to plan for, and would leave the surface mostly intact.

Or you could use zombies.
__________________
Collaborative Settings:
Cyberpunk: Duopoly Nation
Space Opera: Behind the King's Eclipse
And heaps of forum collabs, 30+ and counting!
Daigoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:15 AM   #45
Fred Brackin
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daigoro View Post
I was thinking a massive solar flare could be a good plot device to scare people underground. It would be transient to whatever degree needed, predictable enough to plan for, and would leave the surface mostly intact.

Or you could use zombies.
Go with the zombies. Far more plausible. No solar flare is going to last 50 days much less 50 years. Unless it bakes the surface with raw heat it's not going to force people undreground either.

The problem with hitting the OP's requirement is the "sealed" situation. Apparently even without filtered air. Nothing but some particularly ghastly bio-weapon situation is going to do that.
__________________
Fred Brackin
Fred Brackin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 05:31 PM   #46
Genesis
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin View Post
Go with the zombies. Far more plausible. No solar flare is going to last 50 days much less 50 years. Unless it bakes the surface with raw heat it's not going to force people undreground either.

The problem with hitting the OP's requirement is the "sealed" situation. Apparently even without filtered air. Nothing but some particularly ghastly bio-weapon situation is going to do that.
Yeah, but she's said specifically that there's no genetics research in this timeline, and without sophisticated biochemistry the really scary bio-weapons aren't possible.
Genesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:22 PM   #47
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin View Post
The problem with hitting the OP's requirement is the "sealed" situation. Apparently even without filtered air. Nothing but some particularly ghastly bio-weapon situation is going to do that.
There's various grossly toxic non-biologicals possible, though I doubt a society much below late TL 7-early TL 8 can do that much damage.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 07:40 PM   #48
robkelk
Untitled
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtheobviouspseudonym View Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv.../25/brier1.htm

Apparently in the late 1950s the US Government planned & built a bunker designed to keep Congress & other people alive during & after a nuclear war.
Wow - that sounds a lot like the Diefenbunker just outside of Ottawa.

(The Diefenbunker has an overflow medical room just outside the infirmary. This room's door doesn't have a handle on the inside. While one could use it as a medical ward, it was intended to be the place where the people who snapped under pressure would be locked up...)
__________________
Rob Kelk
“Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.”
– Bernard Baruch,
Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950
No longer reading these forums regularly.
robkelk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2011, 11:12 PM   #49
Daigoro
 
Daigoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meifumado
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin View Post
Go with the zombies. Far more plausible. No solar flare is going to last 50 days much less 50 years. Unless it bakes the surface with raw heat it's not going to force people undreground either.
So make it the sun enters a phase of increased activity, with CMEs, geomagnetic storms, solar proton events, eventually overwhelming the ionosphere's ability to protect the biosphere, and causing catastrophic levels of radiation to reach the surface.

In any case, it's a plot device and you can fill in the details to suit whatever level of scientific rigour you deem is necessary.
__________________
Collaborative Settings:
Cyberpunk: Duopoly Nation
Space Opera: Behind the King's Eclipse
And heaps of forum collabs, 30+ and counting!
Daigoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2011, 08:44 AM   #50
Fred Brackin
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default Re: Minimum TL for a self-sufficient Vault City or equivalent bunker?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daigoro View Post
So make it the sun enters a phase of increased activity, with CMEs, geomagnetic storms, solar proton events, eventually overwhelming the ionosphere's ability to protect the biosphere, and causing catastrophic levels of radiation to reach the surface.

In any case, it's a plot device and you can fill in the details to suit whatever level of scientific rigour you deem is necessary.
I still say zombies. Mad Science before Bad Science. You can't overwhelm the ionosphere with ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation creates the ionosphere.

What really protects us from comic and solar high energy radiation is miles and miles of atmosphere. You can disrupt the ozone layer and get too much UV but that won't cause you to go underground and especially not to seal yourself off from the atmosphere.
__________________
Fred Brackin
Fred Brackin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
base, bunker, colony, self-sufficient, vault city


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.