05-07-2011, 01:05 AM | #41 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
|
|
05-07-2011, 03:01 AM | #42 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
An Axe is lighter than a Greatsword, I think, but is always going to be U parry. Light is not the point.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
05-07-2011, 06:53 AM | #43 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
Balance wise a shortsword, broadsword, longsword and greatsword are similarly functional as balanced attack and defense blades. Unbalanced wise, a falchion, morningstar, bastard sword, naginata, great axe, halberd, tetsubo, and maul are similarly functional as attack or defense weapons. The question then is strictly when does the extra ST compensate for the U, RAW wise, since any defensive attack will eliminate the U at the cost of -2 dmg, that's always an option, and once 2 dmg over 3xST is arrived at, there's no reason not to use defensive attack all the time since dmg caps at 3xST. |
|
05-07-2011, 10:12 AM | #44 | |
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
If it's a matter of balance, not weight, why isn't it U-parry when used two handed, at least when swung (to match the naginata)? |
|
05-07-2011, 10:21 AM | #45 | ||
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.sjgames.com/gurps/faq/FAQ4-3.html#SS3.5.2 3.5.2 What is the difference between an unbalanced and an unreadied weapon? Can I make an unbalanced weapon balanced by having enough ST? An unreadied weapon is a weapon which is hard to manipulate because of weight or bulk. It is possible to reduce the unreadiness by having sufficient ST (see p. B270 for all the possibilities). An unbalanced weapon is inherently unbalanced, and you can only either attack or parry with it in a turn. Not because of its weight or unwieldiness (which could be overcome with high ST), but because it is physically held differently for attack and defense. For instance, if you're swinging an axe at full force or lashing with a whip, the weapon isn't in a guard position. If you're holding the axe across your body or using the whip's handle to parry like a stick, it isn't in an offensive position. It has nothing to do with how "unready" attacking or parrying makes the weapon – it has to do with how the weapon is gripped. As for the Bastard Sword being listed as an Unbalanced weapon, you can safely change its listing to make it Unreadied if wielded in one hand. Last edited by Ze'Manel Cunha; 05-07-2011 at 10:24 AM. |
||
05-07-2011, 05:48 PM | #46 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
|
|
05-07-2011, 07:27 PM | #47 |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Unready I can see but not unbalanced.
__________________
Joseph Paul |
05-07-2011, 09:17 PM | #48 | |||
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
05-07-2011, 09:23 PM | #49 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
Quote:
Look, I can look at pictures. If you stick a handle on one end and a long blade on the other, and the weapon can be wielded balanced in two hands, then it has a balance point for one-handed use. The greatsword already acknowledges this. Unless the handle is made of plastic and the blade is made of, oh, depleted uranium or something, and the bastard "sword" actually looks like a giant question mark with a rack of elf horns on it for looks, I'm just not sure what you're claiming the bastard sword is supposed to be. It's. A. Bastard. Sword. Being designed for one- or two- handed use, it's inherently going to be better for one-handed use than the greatsword, which is only designed for two-handed use. Next thing you know, we'll find out that with enough strength, the greatsword is a better throwing weapon than a throwing axe. If you had a pistol with a folding stock attachment, and you discovered that it was less accurate and generally not as good with the stock folded as a rifle wielded in one hand, you bet there would be some questions about that. |
|
05-07-2011, 10:03 PM | #50 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
|
Re: Two-handed sword question
That's one interpretation. Another would be that the Longsword is a weapon around 48" long, almost as good in one hand as two (what Fiore preferred); and a Bastard Sword is an example around 54" long, really better with two hands (what Vadi preferred); with a Greatsword around 60" and only effective in two hands.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature |
Tags |
sword, two-handed swords |
|
|