02-10-2010, 03:28 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Explosion damage is weak?
A hand grenade sized explosion (8d) doing 28 damage (no frags) becomes notably non lethal once you get further than 6 feet from it according to the rules as I understand them.
Damage at 1 yds: 28/3 = ~9 Damage at 2 yds: 28/6 = ~5 Damage at 3 yds: 28/9 = ~3 Am I not getting it or do the rules really say that you would only take about 3 damage if you stood 7 feet away from a grenade-sized explosion (no frags)? According to the rules of large area injury (B400), explosions cause large area injury. Does that mean that the damage applies to each location separately (i.e. damage rolled applies to skull, torso, feet, etc.)? I don't think so, but maybe I don't understand. Seems to me that explosions in themselves are gimped by the rules. Thoughts? |
02-10-2010, 03:31 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Explosions, on their own, rarely kill people from a great distance. Incidental fragmentation does.
Remember that if there is anything lying around that the blast could propel, there will be fragmentation damage from that.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela! |
02-10-2010, 03:32 PM | #3 |
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Explosions are just fast moving gas. They need to be pretty damn big to be lethal. Fragmentation is what kills.
|
02-10-2010, 03:37 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Quote:
Remember an explosion expands in all directions at once so from anything but very close up most of that energy is wasted hitting empty space. |
|
02-10-2010, 04:16 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
According to a soldier that I know, an M67 grenade has a kill (not casualty) radius of 5 meters due almost entirely to the blast overpressure. Beyond that the primary risk is shrapnel.
My thought was that if that is true, a grenade-sized explosion in GURPS ought to do at least 10 damage out to 5 yeards. |
02-10-2010, 04:20 PM | #6 | |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Quote:
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
|
02-10-2010, 04:22 PM | #7 | |
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Quote:
|
|
02-10-2010, 04:23 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Quote:
In general, explosions don't kill people. It's the aftereffects (shrapnel, collapsing structures, etc) that kill people. Well, unless you're really, really close to the explosion (or it's really, really freaking big).
__________________
Quos deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Latin: Those whom a god wishes to destroy, he first drives mad. |
|
02-10-2010, 04:26 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Quote:
|
|
02-10-2010, 04:26 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Re: Explosion damage is weak?
Thanks all! I think I've got the issue settled.
|
Tags |
kromm explanation |
|
|