|
12-31-2019, 10:54 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Dec 2015
|
Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Should a Bi character with Lecherousness get more points for the disadvantage? It dose seem it would be a bigger disadvantage for them.
|
12-31-2019, 12:07 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin Texas
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Not from my perspective. You hit on the most attractive person around that suits your taste. It's still hitting on one character.
__________________
He stared out in the distance to see the awesome might of the Meerkat war party. |
12-31-2019, 12:11 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Virginia
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Lecherousness and Xenophilla and, as someone on these forums said, you've got Jack Harkness.
__________________
Per Ardua Per Astra! Ancora Imparo |
12-31-2019, 12:53 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Dec 2015
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
|
12-31-2019, 12:56 PM | #5 |
Forum Pervert
(If you have to ask . . .) Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere high up.
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
|
12-31-2019, 12:59 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Depending on the culture, bisexuality might be a quirk.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
12-31-2019, 12:49 PM | #7 | ||
Join Date: Dec 2015
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-31-2019, 12:52 PM | #8 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Standards adjust to one's surroundings. So I don't think the disadvantage must increase or decrease in value because of one's optimal preferences assuming large enough groups.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
12-31-2019, 10:16 PM | #9 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Quote:
as could "an appealing member". Given the -5 for handsome/beautiful perhaps the baseline requires "attractive" advantage, and you're not obligated to hit on average (0-point) attractive chars? Quote:
Even if you're not a lech you can still hit on people when it IS opportune. As far as I'm concerned, "androphilia" and "gynephilia" are quirks (mechanically there's no defined upside, just that you can be manipulated by a gender) so since bisexuality is BOTH it's like -2. If we assume that a monosexual genderphilia is assumed by default then bisexuality should only be -1. Power-Ups 6 pg 26 has "Alternative Sexuality" quirk for "out" people as a minor version of social stigma, but that's basically reputation-wise, not relevant to characters who don't have reputations. Pretence (pg 33) is for closeted, a form of "Trivial Secret", but that still doesn't cover the suceptability to being seduced by 2 sexes instead of 1. If there were an alien species with 3 sexes then being trisexual might be -2, and if there were six genders then liking them all would probably be a -5? The only way I can think for it to always balance out to 0 would be if you had some kind of inherent penalty to seduce people who you weren't attracted to. Basically if being attracted to someone had benefits (like +1 to influence them) to balance out the drawbacks (-1 to resist influence from them) or however that works. Last edited by Andrew Hackard; 01-01-2020 at 11:14 AM. |
||
12-31-2019, 12:51 PM | #10 | |
Forum Pervert
(If you have to ask . . .) Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere high up.
|
Re: Lecherousness & Bisexuality
Quote:
Kleptomania doesn't go up in points in a TL7+ game due to the increased availability of goods compared to TL3. Compulsive Liar doesn't go up in points due to the size of the party. If you were to rebuild Lecherousness based more on the Sense of Duty disadvantage, an argument could be made for it. But, as it stands, bi characters don't get, or need, any modifier to Lecherousness. |
|
Tags |
bisexual, bisexuality, lecherousness |
|
|