11-19-2010, 06:55 AM | #1 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
[Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Greetings, all!
Superheroic fiction has a fair share of characters going for their enemies in a close and personal manner. There's the well-known brick archetype, but there are also others, such as the agile amazon, some speedster subtypes etc. But from a purely rules-oriented PoV, what's the point? A close combatant will get maybe a 30% discount compared to a 'blaster' in terms of point cost of the main attack power, but will get endless opportunities due to being unable to engage opponents at range. Notably, close combatant all but have to invest in some sort of high-cost defensive or mobility power just to survive getting into range; their attacks are easier to defend against; they are not as good at dealing with waves of dispersed mooks; they effectively can't engage hard-to-access enemies unless they have a mobility power comparable to flight etc. So what's the incentive, aside from 'but I wanna be an agile amazon/big bruiser/cool cutlass wielder'? Thanks in advance! |
11-19-2010, 07:11 AM | #2 | |
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2010, 07:55 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Hit locations would be one reason. Only blasters that sink a lot of points into skill or accuracy can compete with melee character's ability to exploit weak points on the target. And if the bad guy is holding onto a weapon or defense that the blaster can't deal with someone has to go in and get rid of it.
That extra DR or dodging skill they use to get into close combat also means that they can work well as support. With more DR they can grapple the enemy speedster and take the hit when the blasters blasts both of them. With the extra Dodge (or Parry or maybe Block) they can safely go ahead of blasters and shut down defenses in cramped areas like a cave system or supervillain base. |
11-19-2010, 08:46 AM | #4 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Quote:
|
|
11-19-2010, 09:05 AM | #5 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Also, ST is generally a good thing, more ability to wear armor, damage, and HP
And weapons are good, and most supers are TL 8, so very fine, balanced katanas etc are cheap High ST + Good Weapon + Weapon Master = Fun And weapon attack skills also are your close in defense skills |
11-19-2010, 09:18 AM | #6 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
High ST is, much to the confusion of some players, a flexible, general utility power, not "just" a combat power. There's a surprising number of problems that can be solved by applying enough Basic Lift to the situation in a creative way. Especially with Comic Book Physics, where picking up something big by one small part of it doesn't make the whole thing collapse. ;)
And of course high ST characters are perfectly capable of throwing cars and such, which gets you +4 to hit for being able to target the area, makes it hard to Dodge because you need enough Step to get out from under the car, and makes a big satisfying smashing sound. By the way, I have to agree that ranged blasters that haven't spent points on defenses are glass canons, and high value targets that will promptly be shot. As a supervillain, if I see, say, a crunchy Cyclopsoid at 300 yards raining eye-laser powered destruction down on me, and a Wolverine Clone or even Ersatz Hulk at 300 yards running towards me, and I have ranged attacks? I'm going to take a few turns to try and shoot Cyclops because he's the IMMEDIATE problem. Wolverine or the Hulk or whatever will be a problem momentarily, but shooting HIM doesn't stop Cyclops from punching me through six comic panels with a blaster hit. I'd rather live long enough to worry about Wolverine rather than be taken out early.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
11-19-2010, 09:19 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The former Chochenyo territory
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Quote:
2) By default, Deceptive Attack is melee only (although in my opinion, a Supers game should go ahead and allow Deceptive ranged attacks). 3) Grappling provides a lot of options that a simple ranged blaster doesn't have, like immobilizing opponents without harming them, grabbing weapons/macguffins, and preventing villains from chasing down your squishy allies. (High levels of TK can do this too, but not cheaply.)
__________________
My gaming blog: Thor's Grumblings Keep your friends close, and your enemies in Close Combat. |
|
11-19-2010, 09:22 AM | #8 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Quote:
A more distant analogy would be armed forces: you can have all the artillery you want, but sooner or later you have to send the tanks in to take the enemy's ground away from them. Blasters, like artillery, tend to be vulnerable in close quarters fights; they need to be shielded by immobile defenses or by their less vulnerable brick teammates. Bill Stoddard |
|
11-19-2010, 09:29 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Oh yes, also Striking ST - My favorite Katana is cheap
|
11-19-2010, 09:31 AM | #10 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
|
Re: [Supers] What's the point of making Mêlée-oriented characters?
Quote:
Most of the players I've run in Super's campaigns would MUCH rather run a character that lets them mimic the exploits of Wolverine, Batman*, Spider-Man*, and the Hulk than Cyclops, The Human Torch, or Green Arrow. Most of the most popular characters in comics either lean towards melee (like Wolverine and most of the Bat-family) or are balanced melee and ranged fighters (Like Captain America and Superman). Range focused and purely ranged fighters (like the Punisher and Green Arrow) are much less popular. *Yes, I know they have ranged attacks, but they are primarily melee fighters.
__________________
My ongoing thread of GURPS versions of DC Comics characters. |
|
Tags |
balance, melee, supers |
|
|