10-21-2009, 10:54 PM | #21 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Re: Injury Tolerance (Damage Reduction)
The wiki has him at:
Height: 50[1]-100[2] meters (164-328 feet) Weight: 20,000[1] - 60,000[2] tons That's SM+8 to SM+10 with a calculated ST/HP of (using cube root x 2) 684 - 986. Obviously that's just not impressive enough. I would double ST (at least) and still add IT:DR. Even so, I doubt it will stand up to military hardware without IT:DR and DR100+. |
10-21-2009, 11:02 PM | #22 | |
Computer Scientist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Re: Injury Tolerance (Damage Reduction)
Quote:
|
|
10-21-2009, 11:57 PM | #23 | ||
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Injury Tolerance (Damage Reduction)
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-22-2009, 10:10 AM | #24 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Injury Tolerance (Damage Reduction)
Quote:
|
|
10-22-2009, 10:21 AM | #25 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Injury Tolerance (Damage Reduction)
That's why I calculated it from the required basic load, not from the formula in Basic. The fact is, the formula in Basic is inverse cube and only makes sense for things which actually obey the square/cube law; it doesn't really produce sensible results for most giants.
|
Tags |
advantage, powers |
|
|