11-01-2011, 08:05 PM | #21 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Sometimes people cite Canon 18 of the Fourth Lateran Council (Pope Innocent III, 1215), but it's a bit of a stretch.
Quote:
|
|
11-01-2011, 08:10 PM | #22 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Quote:
Bill Stoddard |
|
11-01-2011, 08:11 PM | #23 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Enchanted Land-O-Cheese
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Martin Luther was opposed to clergy "bearing the sword", but in this case he wasn't talking about edged weapons vs. blunt weapons; he disapproved of clergy being actively involved in warfare period; (as some of his fellow reformers did during the Peasant's War)
|
11-01-2011, 08:39 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Re: Wizard Vows
I like the idea of using point values for secrets to determine the worth of a vow better than the suggestions used in the book. IF you break your vow, you should acquire a disadvantage worth twice the cost of the vow (at least until you make amends or pay it off).
If the guild will revoke his license so that he essentially has a -4 reputation amongst guild mages and can be jailed for practicing his craft that should be worth 5pts for the (-10pt) rep possibility and then half the cost of the enemy you may have chasing after you for practicing in civilized lands...
__________________
Villain's Round Table |
11-01-2011, 10:04 PM | #25 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Quote:
|
|
11-02-2011, 01:39 AM | #26 | |
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Quote:
|
|
11-02-2011, 02:56 AM | #27 | ||||
Never Been Pretty
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Not that I haven't found the discussion illuminating, but most of it has had nothing to do with my initial question.
I'm not looking to mirror D&D, I'm looking for game world color. So the traditions of using these weapons and armor have nothing to do with magic per se, its completely a social/traditional thing. Quote:
IDHMBWM, but IIRC you only get points for Vow if you cannot break it. Quote:
The campaign takes place after the Test, at least for focused wizards. And yes, being a Renegade is an option. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Dragondog; 11-02-2011 at 03:29 AM. |
||||
11-02-2011, 10:20 AM | #28 |
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Ugh, thinking about this for a while, pricing Vows correctly is very messy.
First of all, I'd look at two broad aspects of a Vow: Is it completely within your control or can outside forces make you break the Vow? Compare "Always try to help the poor" with "Always help the poor". You will break the latter at some point if the universe is against you. (This is related to how Secret works against you. It's not just about keeping your mouth shut, but the universe trying to uncover your secret on a roll of 6 or less on a 3d6.) Then consider the effect of the Vow while you adhere to it: That's some disadvantage. Vow ("Never speak") is essentially Cannot Speak (Mute). Vow ("Pray for 2 hours / day"), is somewhat like Extra Sleep 2 hours / day. Then consider what happens when you break the Vow (willingly or not). This is some new disad that lasts for a certain period. The Basic Set and Vows from the Chi-based power modifier or for Clerics seems to assume something like a 1 month quest to restore your Vow. But it could range from a day of misfortune to permanently losing all your Magery. Factor in how easy it is to break the Vow. "Never speak" is trivial to circumvent in an emergency, so are various forms of Pacifism or weapon restrictions. (Just grab a better weapon and put on non-textile armor.) If you have fastened your entire life (say, this gives -1 to ST and -1 to FP, as you need some effect of this Vow), there is little reason to suddenly give it up. The ST won't come back any time soon, the FP might be back on the next day. More extreme cases might require you to rebuild your life (and character sheet), in which case you could have just as well bought off the disadvantage. Then comes the pricing: A Vow that you can willingly keep forever is worth at most as much as the disadvantage it gives you while you keep it. It might be worth significantly less if you can break it easily and the penalty is light. Half of the disad value for something easily breakable seems appropriate for the month of recovery. A Vow that the universe can make you break is worth the above plus a fraction of the disadvantage you gain when you break the Vow. That's really the best guideline I can come up with. So, for the examples in this thread: Not using certain weapons / armor is maybe a quirk each for a low ST mage. It's also easy enough to break in an emergency. (Use a spear with staff skill or shoot a crossbow from default with lots of aiming and Luck or wear heavy armor when meeting the assassin at night.) Consequences are presumably loss of Magic Powers for the typical duration of a few weeks. From this, I'd say it's a Quirk (Wizards don't like metal weapons & armor) [-1]. If you permanently lose Magery or suddenly die or have to retire, it still would be only [-2] (the full value of these equipment restrictions) because it's entirely within your choice to not use these weapons. This assumes that if someone puts you into chainmail while unconscious, that this doesn't count as breaking the Vow. If even touching such weapons or being forcefully put into armor gives you severe penalties, the Vow becomes a more severe disad. Say, metallic armor destroys your Magery (but only if you wear it) and this is a well-known weakness of wizards and someone can force you to put on armor ... Then if you break this Vow you acquire the 50 point Disad equivalent to losing your Magery and Spells permanently. However, to make you break this Vow you would have to be at the mercy of someone else, so at that point people could just as well kill you ... So maybe only 10% of the gained disads apply, giving you a [-2 + -5] Vow. As a comparison, a Secret on average shows up in 10% of the game sessions, and you can try to prevent its revelation and nobody has to subdue you just to make your secret public. The Secret is worth 50% of the disads that permanently replace it. So something that probably shows up just as often but is much harder to work against you should be worth a lot less. That's why I chose 10% of the new disad. With this in mind, some of the Vows in the Basic Set seem badly priced ... The "no edged weapons" [-10] is just crazy. Yes, it's the most important class of weapons (in TL3), but many fighters can live just fine with spears or hammers or using blunt sword-like things if necessary. Well, the GM could always screw you by only dropping +5 swords in the loot or using encounters that are immune to anything but cutting damage, but that would be weird. On the other hand, the Vow ("Never Speak") [-10] seems to be reasonable compared to Cannot Speak ("Mute") [-25]. Regards Ts |
11-02-2011, 02:45 PM | #29 | ||
Never Been Pretty
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Quote:
Same thing with Pacifism, it cannot be broken. Same thing with weapon restrictions. If the only weapon you have available is one you have Vowed not to use, you will not use it. Quote:
A Vow has the same cost no matter who you are. No matter if you're low ST or high ST. Warrior or wizard. I'm looking for costs based on RAW, not costs that disregard it. Wizards may like swords and metal armor. They may even love them and collect them. But they will not use them in combat. It's not the same thing. |
||
11-02-2011, 03:07 PM | #30 | |
Dog of Lysdexics
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne FL, Formerly Wellington NZ
|
Re: Wizard Vows
Quote:
Of course the system restriction inspired it, but unlike other D&D settings Dragonlace bothered to explain it in they setting rather than just ignore the conisdeance. |
|
Tags |
dragonlance, vow, wizard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|