05-21-2016, 01:57 PM | #11 | |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The Land of Enchantment
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
I agree that tree moss et al isn't Navigation skill. It's Naturalist or Area Knowledge. And, frankly, I have no problems with using the former as a complementary skill for Navigation, or the latter as a replacement. Either would, for instance, let you estimate your elevation in a mountain range because you noticed that the pinyon/juniper forest is gone and now you're surrounded by Ponderosa pine. And knowing your elevation is a big clue in orienteering.
Area Knowledge must be treated as a /TL skill, too. Area Knowledge (American West)/TL8 probably includes the knowledge that I-25 is the north-south highway east of the Front Range, but not how to follow the Purgatoire River to shortcut the Santa Fe Trail. That's /TL5 or 6... Quote:
__________________
I'd need to get a grant and go shoot a thousand goats to figure it out. Last edited by acrosome; 05-21-2016 at 02:04 PM. |
|
05-21-2016, 02:54 PM | #12 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Quote:
This isn't typically a problem, but if time-displacement of some sort is going on it makes sense to note when as well as where your Area Knowledge is from. If there are multiple overlapping but largely separate societies in the same place and time (humans and talking animals, or faeries, or vampires...or in some cases European settlers and natives), I think it would be good to notate which one you have Area Knowledge for. In a city or neighborhood, human Area Knowledge will tell you about businesses, criminal activity, government offices, and the like...Rodent area knowledge will tell you about prominent cats in the area, what regions are exposed to hawk attacks, and where the best garbage is found, but probably won't help you get to the DMV...or at best will do so at a much larger penalty than the human version.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
10-09-2018, 04:32 AM | #13 |
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Hyperbolic Navigation is a TL7 radio navigation technology that's gradually replaced by GPS at TL8. There's no mention of it in Basic or High-Tech that I can find. As far as I can see, it gives a bonus to Navigation like GPS, although this requires familiarity with the receiving equipment, and maybe an Electronics Operation/TL7 (Sensors) roll.
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
10-09-2018, 05:37 AM | #14 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Nor does it mention, let alone discuss, the use of radio direction finding in navigation, a big thing at TL6-7.
And, while we're here, for some reason you didn't mention DF16: Wilderness Adventures, which has many uses for Navigation, and interesting possibilities on failures.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." Last edited by Rupert; 10-09-2018 at 05:42 AM. |
10-09-2018, 06:15 AM | #15 | |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Luxembourg
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Quote:
Sorry, but 1) and 2) are mostly false, as said above. 1) by personal experience hiking in Scandinavia. Granted, using an old map could be a problem. It is true near the Poles, and truer (more true ?) in areas where the angle between real and magnetic North is more apparent. 2) see for example http://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/finland/ it was definitively true before satellite mapping for remote part of Siberia , Antartica and Arctic Ice fields, but definitively not so for Europe, and likely not for Canada. ---- I have followed courses in Land and Sea navigation (both before GPS became common, although they already existed) and have a default in Air navigation from playing Flight Simulator. GPS in all case is a game changer. a +3 bonus is probably understated. With modern instruments and maps, you usually have such bonuses that you only need to fear the automatic failure/critical failure roll as long as you have minimal training. Still, it happen quite often ! With map/compass/astral reckoning/radio navigation ... failure will happen even to trained peoples, especially in low visibility and lack of area knowledge. With only the raw skill .. that's when the fun start :) I would give a huge bonus to navigation to anyone who have relevant area knowledge. I also suggested optional sub-specialties for land navigation : urban navigation and car navigation. It could also be hyper-specialization perk or familiarity, but it definitively represent existing peoples. Last edited by Celjabba; 10-09-2018 at 06:37 AM. |
|
10-09-2018, 06:39 AM | #16 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Quote:
"How can you tell a inexperienced officer?" "Because his routes are straight lines defined by compass bearings."
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." Last edited by Rupert; 10-11-2018 at 04:22 AM. |
|
10-11-2018, 01:25 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Something that gets ignored for lower TL versions of Navigation is degree of accuracy, especially in the absence of known landmarks.
Before TL6, marine navigators were doing their job right if they could get their ship within ~20 miles of their destination. At TL6/early TL7, marine and aerial navigators were doing a great job if they could get within ~5 miles of their destination. Under less than ideal circumstances, it is also easy to mistake one landmark for another, assuming that you can see landmarks at all. For example, during WW2, it was not uncommon for high altitude bombers to get lost and accidentally bomb the wrong target, or even the wrong city! (e.g., the USAAF accidentally bombed a Swiss town rather than a German one.) Darkness penalties should apply to most forms of pre-TL8 Navigation, as should penalties for relatively poor visibility. Having multiple people make Navigation skill rolls is realistic, but it requires a complete set of equipment - and sometimes a dedicated crew station - for each person making the attempt. There's also the problem of whose Navigation do you trust? The GM should make Navigation rolls in secret, potentially setting up a situation where one navigator is right and the other navigator is wrong. If the navigator who is wrong is the ranking officer, tragedy can ensue. |
10-11-2018, 02:09 AM | #18 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
|
10-11-2018, 07:14 AM | #19 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Quote:
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
10-11-2018, 08:01 AM | #20 | |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Luxembourg
|
Re: [Basic] Skill of the week: Navigation
Quote:
Poor visibility would actually be a bonus to navigation in those cases : the errors usually happened because the pilot saw *a* landing strip and landed on it ignoring the GPS/VOR/... telling them they were 20+ km off target. In my opinion, the biggest cause of navigation error, at least among trained people with actual skill, is fatigue. I can attest from personal experience that if you are dead tired, you will make idiotic navigation mistakes even when GPS, Compass and map tell you you are wrong. |
|
Tags |
basic, navigation, orienteering, skill of the week, world building |
|
|