07-07-2010, 07:12 AM | #41 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Because, clearly, the problem with APEP rounds is that they're lovingly hand-crafted by some Belgians. If we mass-produced them, clearly they could become cheaper! I wonder what we could use in an Ultra-Tech environment to do just that. Perhaps a Robo-fac?
__________________
My Blog: Mailanka's Musing. Currently Playing: Psi-Wars, a step-by-step exploration of building your own Space Opera setting, inspired by Star Wars. |
07-07-2010, 07:24 AM | #42 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Quote:
TL 8 Concealable Vest: DR 12/5, 2lbs, $1000 TL 9 Reflex Vest: DR 12/4, 2 lbs, $300 TL 11 Monocrys Vest: DR 24/8, 2 lbs, $300 Tactical Vests TL 8 Assault Vest: 12/5, 8 lbs, $900 TL 9 Reflex Tactical Vest: 18/7, 9 lbs, $900 TL 11 Monocrys Tactical Vest: 36/15, 9 lbs, $900 Trauma Plates TL 8 Trauma Plate: +25 DR, 4 lbs, $500 TL 9 Trauma Plate: +34 DR, 9 lbs, $600 TL 11 Trauma Plate: +69 DR, 9 lbs, $600 So, clearly there are comparable armors that do comparably well. If you want to stick a Trauma Plate on a concealable Reflex Vest, knock yourself out. And if there's an error here, I think it's clearly with HT: It's the only one that breaks the pattern, and somehow, those extra 6 pounds of extra weight on the Assault Vest amount to zero extra DR. Either the Concealable Vest is too good, or the Assault Vest is too weak.
__________________
My Blog: Mailanka's Musing. Currently Playing: Psi-Wars, a step-by-step exploration of building your own Space Opera setting, inspired by Star Wars. |
|
07-07-2010, 07:25 AM | #43 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Quote:
There's a lot of stuff in UT that matches common items from other settings/systems. The 10mm Storm Carbine is there to try and match the basic weapons from Aliens.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
07-07-2010, 07:29 AM | #44 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
My point with the Heavy Clamshell is that if you grant the Advanced Body Armor in HT, than something built in the same fashion (overlapping plates on a flexible backing, like scale armor) at the TL 9 represented in UT, you would use the DR for the Heavy Clamshell. If someone where to build a clamshell out of the the titanium alloy they use in the Pinnacle product, it would weigh about the same, it just wouldnt be flexible.
If you dont like the concept represented at all, then youll be disallowing the Advanced Body Armor, and thus UT's armor is better than HT and you dont have an issue. |
07-07-2010, 07:33 AM | #45 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
At this point, it's looking like the Dragonskin might be best described as semi-ablative (Ablative might be too much, or might not - I'd call it semi for the moment) - if that ends up being the final verdict on the stuff, then the only real problem with Ultratech is the lack of other semi-ablative personal armor to compare it to, rather than making the entirely non-ablative concealable flexible armor look weak.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
07-07-2010, 07:46 AM | #46 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Then explain why they are so expensive, when the so similar gauss rounds are so cheap? Being low volume vs high volume would explain the radical difference.
|
07-07-2010, 07:49 AM | #47 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Quote:
Sort of like the Shield stats in Basic.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
07-07-2010, 07:50 AM | #48 | ||
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
07-07-2010, 07:52 AM | #49 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
Maybe some property of theirs prevents mass-production.
|
07-07-2010, 07:53 AM | #50 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Why does UT concealable armor suck?
I'm cool with that. But trauma plates aren't part of the problem that the OP is having, as far as I can tell. EDIT: They'd also be ablative in both books, if one made that change, so the situation would remain constant - still no flexible ablative armor to compare against, non-ablative concealable armors remain in proportion.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog Last edited by Bruno; 07-07-2010 at 08:06 AM. |
|
|