Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > Roleplaying in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2016, 07:14 AM   #1
Carl Rodgers
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Default [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Instead of employing atomic weapons, the US proceeds with a ground based invasion of the Japanese islands in World War 2. What do you think would have happened and what changes would occur in the modern world?
Carl Rodgers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 07:17 AM   #2
Mack_JB
 
Mack_JB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Hundreds of thousands more Japanese civilians die, the military is 100% dead, and Japan ceases to exist as a modern nation state after the US conquers and occupies it. Since we're doing Alt History, then sometime in the late 60's it becomes the newest of the United States.
Mack_JB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 08:26 AM   #3
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

If the Japanese resist as they intended ... then yes, what he said.
johndallman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 09:57 AM   #4
adm
 
adm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MO, U.S.A.
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

There would also be significant US causalities, the US post war advantage of comparatively few combat loses would be gone. Hokkaido, and ~half of Honshu would Russian. There would be no South Korea.

Possible upside, after fighting closely enough together to actually fight side by side against Japan, post war relations between the USA and USSR may be more diplomatic than military.
__________________
Xenophilia is Dr. Who. Plus Lecherous is Jack Harkness.- Anaraxes
adm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 10:03 AM   #5
robkelk
Untitled
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack_JB View Post
... Since we're doing Alt History, then sometime in the late 60's it becomes the newest of the United States.
Before Puerto Rico, or at the same time (which would make Japan the 52nd state)?
__________________
Rob Kelk
“Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.”
– Bernard Baruch,
Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950
No longer reading these forums regularly.
robkelk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 10:44 AM   #6
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

The admission of a single state that had that many electoral votes would be deeply contested. And it seems likely that after brutal defeat in a conventional war, Japan would still be bitterly opposed to the USA, possibly to the point of terrorism or guerrilla war. I'd bet on Robinson Jeffers's "We must put freedom away and stiffen into bitter empire."
__________________
Bill Stoddard

I don't think we're in Oz any more.
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 10:46 AM   #7
Mack_JB
 
Mack_JB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Heck, go for broke. We make Japan, the Philippines, and all of our Pacific Territories like Guam and Samoa into States, rather than giving any of them independence or autonomy.
Mack_JB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 11:28 AM   #8
Johan Larson
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Germany fought damn hard against the Allies when they were invaded. But you didn't see them drilling civilians to fight with spears, and they weren't seriously considering liquidating everyone who wasn't fit to fight, even in the darkest days. The Japanese did. It is very likely the Japanese would have fought even more viciously than the Germans on home soil, necessitating an even more devastating invasion, and leaving an even more smashed country at the end of it.

The victorious Allies might have found themselves occupying a nation of nothing but women, children, and old men, and not so many of them, either.

Last edited by Johan Larson; 05-30-2016 at 11:33 AM.
Johan Larson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 11:39 AM   #9
adm
 
adm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MO, U.S.A.
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan Larson View Post
Germany fought damn hard against the Allies when they were invaded. But you didn't see them drilling civilians to fight with spears, and they weren't seriously considering liquidating everyone who wasn't fit to fight, even in the darkest days. The Japanese did. It is very likely the Japanese would have fought even more viciously than the Germans on home soil, necessitating an even more devastating invasion, and leaving an even more smashed country at the end of it.

The victorious Allies might have found themselves occupying a nation of nothing but women, children, and old men, and not so many of them, either.
Considering the number of civilian suicides at Okinawa, you are likely right, if not understating the outcome.
__________________
Xenophilia is Dr. Who. Plus Lecherous is Jack Harkness.- Anaraxes
adm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2016, 12:04 PM   #10
David Johnston2
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default Re: [Alt History] Alternative conclusion to the Pacific conflict in WW 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by adm View Post
There would also be significant US causalities, the US post war advantage of comparatively few combat loses would be gone. Hokkaido, and ~half of Honshu would Russian. There would be no South Korea.

Possible upside, after fighting closely enough together to actually fight side by side against Japan, post war relations between the USA and USSR may be more diplomatic than military.
While it seems likely that there would be no South Korea, Russia did not have the shipping capacity to launch an amphibious invasion. Also I don't think there would be all that many U.S. casualties because it is really unlikely that that Japan would fight for long after after they were convinced that they couldn't break the American beach head. I think that would be sufficient to convince them there was no hope.
David Johnston2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alternate history


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.