Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-11-2015, 01:41 PM   #21
shawnhcorey
 
shawnhcorey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turhan's Bey Company View Post
Water power defined, as it is used in the OP, as waterwheels.
Which totally overlooks the amount of human power available with fresh water and sewage.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer.
˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ
shawnhcorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 02:24 PM   #22
Ulzgoroth
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnhcorey View Post
Which totally overlooks the amount of human power available with fresh water and sewage.
I don't think it's overlooking, it's just classifying separately.

Water supply and water powered mills are really quite distinct, even if both involve water and can involve varying amounts of labor.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident.
Ulzgoroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 02:38 PM   #23
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnhcorey View Post
Which totally overlooks the amount of human power available with fresh water and sewage.
That's not what anyone uses "water power" to mean in ordinary, everyday English. There's wind power, water power, tidal power, steam power, nuclear energy, solar energy or power. . . .

The Low-Tech series isn't a treatise on engineering. It's written in informal English, not in technical engineering language or equations.
__________________
Bill Stoddard

I don't think we're in Oz any more.
whswhs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 03:09 PM   #24
Peter Knutsen
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcanjo7Sagi View Post
The problem with a "flat TL" is that it doen't cover all existing technology variations within a certain time or civilization. Because of that I prefer to analyze every technological aspect separately, creating a separate TL for each aspect.
But how many aspects do you use?
Peter Knutsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 03:12 PM   #25
Peter Knutsen
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by whswhs View Post
Different issues arise with applied technology like grain mills, of course.
Yes, I'm thinking about applied technology. I'm positing that it might (I'm not sure) be better to define TL according to what is available to to fairly common people (or to "reference common people") rather than what is actually available but is to difficult to get hold of that only freakin' god-kings can actually get to enjoy it.

Also, it is important to keep in mind that the whole concept of Tech Level arose, and AFAIK in Classic Traveller, as a shorthand for GMs to convey what kinds of gear (primarily weapon and armour) they could purchase on any given planet.

Both as a convenience for the GM, not having to micro-manage each individual piece of gear ("anything that is TL X is available, and anything that is TL X-1 is available at 1/3 price"), and as an empowerment of the players, because in those cases where the GM might want to micromanage it becomes about an order of amgnitude more difficult for him to do so.
Peter Knutsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 03:19 PM   #26
Arcanjo7Sagi
 
Arcanjo7Sagi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Knutsen View Post
But how many aspects do you use?
Well, sometimes I use something similar of those fields in B512: Transportation, Weapons and Armor, Power, Biotech/Medicine. Sometimes I add Information to this. Depends on the need. Sometimes I specify a specific TL for specific skills.

I usually follow the following guidelines questions:

1 - How many fields I will need?

2 - Is there any need to highlight certain skills?

More questions may arise, but I think these are the most important.
__________________
“He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.”
Arcanjo7Sagi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 04:03 PM   #27
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Knutsen View Post
Yes, I'm thinking about applied technology. I'm positing that it might (I'm not sure) be better to define TL according to what is available to to fairly common people (or to "reference common people") rather than what is actually available but is to difficult to get hold of that only freakin' god-kings can actually get to enjoy it.
That's exactly the standard definition of TL. Something that an advanced research can demonstrate in the lab, or a highly skilled engineer can make a prototype of, often with a lot of bugs, isn't the measure of what's "available" at a given TL.
__________________
Bill Stoddard

I don't think we're in Oz any more.
whswhs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 05:07 PM   #28
shawnhcorey
 
shawnhcorey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulzgoroth View Post
I don't think it's overlooking, it's just classifying separately.

Water supply and water powered mills are really quite distinct, even if both involve water and can involve varying amounts of labor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whswhs View Post
That's not what anyone uses "water power" to mean in ordinary, everyday English. There's wind power, water power, tidal power, steam power, nuclear energy, solar energy or power. . . .

The Low-Tech series isn't a treatise on engineering. It's written in informal English, not in technical engineering language or equations.
Considering that the Roman economy ran on slavery, I don't think anything that would keep them health can be easily discarded when it comes to power.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer.
˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ
shawnhcorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 05:34 PM   #29
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnhcorey View Post
Considering that the Roman economy ran on slavery, I don't think anything that would keep them health can be easily discarded when it comes to power.
Keeping an internal combustion engine running requires things like lubrication and the services of a mechanic, but we don't call lubricating oil "fuel" or "power"; we call it "lubrication" or, more broadly, "maintenance" or "overhead costs."
__________________
Bill Stoddard

I don't think we're in Oz any more.
whswhs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2015, 05:56 PM   #30
RyanW
 
RyanW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
Default Re: We're gonna have to rethink the TLs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Brackin View Post
It was 12 boots and not just 4. It would have been 14 if Apollo 13 hadn't had its' problem and more than that if multiple missions had not been trimmed off the back end of the program.
Well, in 1969, it was eight boots (Armstrong, Aldrin, Conrad, and Bean, who wore two boots each). Four boots failed to land in 1970, and sixteen more were landed in 1971 and 1972.
__________________
RyanW
- Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats.
RyanW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
science, tech level, technology

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.