01-07-2010, 07:01 AM | #11 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Flushing, Michigan
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
Not sure I like Zandt-n...it implies Zandt is somehow central, but in an active way, like the Bonaparte timelines.
What we need is a word that implies "Homeline, if something important was missing, rather than different." |
01-07-2010, 08:59 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ronkonkoma, NY
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
We're not Homeline after a divergence point. At least, certainly not a divergence point centering on the development of parachronics.
Our timeline would be startling to Homeliners, because we have a game called GURPS that includes a setting which describes Homeline, Centrum, and the infinite worlds. If our game accurately describes them, they'd certainly be interested in gathering intelligence from us. This reminds me of TV shows and films that take place in the modern world, except without any reference to themselves. For instance, every time a Star Trek story takes place in modern times, it must do so in a world without Star Trek. |
01-07-2010, 09:02 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
You are right about Zandt-n implying active but different result in the worldline.
We aren't Earth-Beta, the Iran theocracy collapsed after some AU interference. Could we be Earth-Gamma or Delta? or have those names been taken by worldlines I am unaware of? |
01-07-2010, 10:18 AM | #14 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
Homeline generally names worlds after what is the first or most important deviation discovered on the first scouting missions in their opinion. No question that they'd find a parallel where important secrets about the multiverse are contained in a work of fiction to be important for that. Therefore if they discovered our world and discovered it before they found some other basis to name it...we might end up being called GURPS. Probably not Jackson, because the Andrew Jackson timelines would have a lock on that.
|
01-07-2010, 11:06 AM | #15 | |
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
Quote:
What year was the first version of Infinite Worlds released? The reason I ask is this; if it took place after the divergence of 95 (Zandt), GURPS would exist on Homeline, but would not have the Infinite Worlds source book. In living up to the tradition of Homelines use of Greek for nomenclature, we could be Mythos. If anyone here knows the actual language, maybe a transliteration of "from thought to creation". |
|
01-07-2010, 01:22 PM | #16 | |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
Quote:
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
|
01-07-2010, 01:57 PM | #17 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
Could it be Chad-1?
|
01-07-2010, 02:48 PM | #18 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
|
01-07-2010, 03:19 PM | #19 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
GURPS has supplements for real life military agencies and other contemporary games so there's no reason why it couldn't have an IW supplement without need of sanction. But it would leave out a lot of the more secret stuff.
|
01-07-2010, 03:25 PM | #20 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
|
Re: Infinite Worlds, which wordline are we in?
Well yes, but it's amusing to think that if there were a game within the game that were in some way 'official' and supported by Infinity, it might not be using GURPS even though the Homeline SJG would be perfectly within their rights to make an unofficial supplement about Infinity.
|
Tags |
infinite worlds |
|
|