Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2016, 10:47 AM   #1
GWJ
 
GWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Encumbrance for Mounts

There is rule for mounts - won’t go past Medium Encumbrance. This is 345 lbs. for Warhorse. My PC has a a Knight with heavy plate armor weighing 109.5 lbs, 3 lbs broadsword, and 15 lbs medium shield, so it's 124.5 lbs.

War saddle = 35 lbs
Rest of EQ (crossbow, bolts, lance, mace, and cloth) also have some weight, and WITHOUT provisions, torches, saddlebags etc. this is 174.7 lbs. So my knight must be 75 kg wimp or he can't charge to the battle on his horse?
GWJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 10:53 AM   #2
Polydamas
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

That armour is about twice as heavy as most plate armour worn in battle, and the cavalry with the fanciest plate armour rarely carried crossbows and bolts and big shields. If you want to wear extremely heavy armour, pay extra for an especially large and strong (ST) horse using the rules in the Basic Set.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper

This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature
Polydamas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 10:55 AM   #3
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

Why would you load your warhorse down with all that stuff? Knights normally owned more than one horse. You have a warhorse for battle, a riding horse for travel, and probably a pack horse for carrying your arms and armor when you aren't using them, not to mention your supplies. Or at a minimum you have two horses, one to carry you and one to carry your heavier gear.
__________________
Bill Stoddard

I don't think we're in Oz any more.
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 10:56 AM   #4
Bruno
 
Bruno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

Nobody puts all of their kit on a fully armored warhorse carrying the rider. That's like packing a racecar full of your laundry and snack bars.

You should have a donkey or pack-horse, possibly ridden by a squire but if you're a very poor knight, it could be just tied to your saddle.

Actually, you should probably have more than one person in your retinue, but definitely one dedicated to your luggage (along with getting you in and out of your armor, cooking your dinner, and all the other scut work).
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table
A Wiki for my F2F Group
A neglected GURPS blog
Bruno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 10:57 AM   #5
GWJ
 
GWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

polydamas, which rules?
GWJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 11:04 AM   #6
Tinman
 
Tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York City
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

Throughout most of history knights did not wear heavy plate armor. They wore mail armor. It's significantly lighter.

The Clydesdale breed of horse was developed to handle the weight of a plate armored knight. The Heavy Warhorse of the book is not meant for plate armor.

Suggestions:
1) Wear lighter armor.
2) Workout with your GM stats & price for a Clydesdale type horse.
3) Go to wikipedia, get info & convert to GURPS stats for a Clydesdale type horse.
4) In DF-5 Allies (p.11) There is a "Stallion". It has a ST 27. That may be enough for your needs.
Tinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 11:08 AM   #7
Tinman
 
Tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New York City
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by GWJ View Post
polydamas, which rules?
It's in the basic book (In blue ink) just to the left of the stat's for the cavalry horse. (The page before the Warhorse.)
Tinman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 11:20 AM   #8
Bruno
 
Bruno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinman View Post
The Clydesdale breed of horse was developed to handle the weight of a plate armored knight.
A common urban myth, but wrong. They're a 19th century cart-horse/plow-horse breed. Their gait is jolting making them unpleasant to ride for lengths of time, their barrel is extremely broad (again, extremely uncomfortable, also a bad bracing postion), their pace is steady but plodding, and they're just too sedate.

They're 19th century tractors; they only exist due to the advancing understanding of breeding available at TL5.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table
A Wiki for my F2F Group
A neglected GURPS blog
Bruno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 11:58 AM   #9
GWJ
 
GWJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

Umm my question was less about "if this is even realistic?", but more like "really? Only Medium Encumbrance? There are any rules to push horse to charge with heavier load?" :P
GWJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2016, 12:04 PM   #10
Kalzazz
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Default Re: Encumbrance for Mounts

I'd allow a riding check (probably at a penalty)

Note your 'Charge' at this point is not going to be very fast at all
Kalzazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.