Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > Roleplaying in General

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2014, 06:42 PM   #1
Disliker of the mary sue
 
Disliker of the mary sue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Default Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Hm I been thinking about this as I consider the day my halfling warrior dies of poorly thought out planning on his sheet, is the fact that Wizards can not use armor without it effecting their ability to use magic just an arbitrary rule for those rpgs with those rules so they don't completely dominate the game? Or does it have precedent in fantasy fiction as a standard trope of sorts?
Disliker of the mary sue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 06:47 PM   #2
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disliker of the mary sue View Post
Hm I been thinking about this as I consider the day my halfling warrior dies of poorly thought out planning on his sheet, is the fact that Wizards can not use armor without it effecting their ability to use magic just an arbitrary rule for those rpgs with those rules so they don't completely dominate the game? Or does it have precedent in fantasy fiction as a standard trope of sorts?
The source seems to be the original edition of D&D, which says that magic users cannot use the magic armor and shields of fighters. It doesn't actually seem to say that they can't use mundane armor and shields, but all the GMs I encountered back in the seventies took it so.

Wizards in fantasy fiction often didn't wear armor, but that was because they mostly weren't soldiers. In fact in traditional sword and sorcery wizards were usually adversaries for the mighty-thewed barbarian heroes, who might not wear armor either.

Bill Stoddard
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 06:48 PM   #3
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disliker of the mary sue View Post
Hm I been thinking about this as I consider the day my halfling warrior dies of poorly thought out planning on his sheet, is the fact that Wizards can not use armor without it effecting their ability to use magic just an arbitrary rule for those rpgs with those rules so they don't completely dominate the game? Or does it have precedent in fantasy fiction as a standard trope of sorts?
Neither Merlin nor Gandalf are typically depicted as heavily armored.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 06:53 PM   #4
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Neither Merlin nor Gandalf are typically depicted as heavily armored.
Heavy armor was largely absent in LoTR, and Merlin was, well, a royal adviser, not a soldier.
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:01 PM   #5
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
Heavy armor was largely absent in LoTR, and Merlin was, well, a royal adviser, not a soldier.
Sure, but there's hardly any examples of spell-casting fantasy wizards prior to D&D at all. Prospero and the Weird Ladies also don't wear any armor.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:15 PM   #6
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Sure, but there's hardly any examples of spell-casting fantasy wizards prior to D&D at all. Prospero and the Weird Ladies also don't wear any armor.
Elric of Melniboné. Sheelba of the Seven Eyes and Ningauble of the Eyeless Face.

Bill Stoddard
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:20 PM   #7
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whswhs View Post
Elric of Melniboné.
Which is clearly one of the inspirations for Pathfinder's Magus class. I'm just saying there's obviously a source for the robes and pointy hat wizard that predates D&D.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:26 PM   #8
Agemegos
 
Agemegos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Which is clearly one of the inspirations for Pathfinder's Magus class. I'm just saying there's obviously a source for the robes and pointy hat wizard that predates D&D.
Yes. Especially with astrological symbols embroidered on the robe it is the get-up of a mediaeval doctor.

Likewise with potions made of weird ingredients, magical incantations in obsolete languages, slips of paper with magical words and diagrams on them worn as amulets, gathering ingredients and making potions at astrologically-defined times and while repeating incantations in obsolete languages, etc.

Medicine has come a long way since Semmelweiss and Lister.
__________________

Decay is inherent in all composite things.
Nod head. Get treat.
Agemegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 07:27 PM   #9
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sir_pudding View Post
Which is clearly one of the inspirations for Pathfinder's Magus class. I'm just saying there's obviously a source for the robes and pointy hat wizard that predates D&D.
Sure. But there are two different concepts here: The wizard who doesn't go around in armor, and the wizard who is not allowed to wear armor. Or use weapons. Does your mage not pick up that sword because he hasn't been trained to use it, or because it's magically impossible for him to do so, or because his magic will desert him if he messes with weapons? Gandalf, at least, was a pretty impressive swordsman. Or swordsmaia.

Bill Stoddard
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 10:31 PM   #10
Irish Wolf
 
Irish Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth, mostly
Default Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?

Can't speak to original D&D, but AD&D's first edition specified that metallic armors were incompatible with higher magics. They also claimed that mailed gauntlets would interfere with the subtle gestures needed to case spells.
__________________
If you break the laws of Man, you go to prison.

If you break the laws of God, you go to Hell.

If you break the laws of Physics, you go to Sweden and receive a Nobel Prize.
Irish Wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
armor, rules, wizards

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.