08-09-2015, 10:01 AM | #21 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: "Less-lethal" Gurps
Quote:
It should, almost certainly, but having it do so is a house rule.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
08-09-2015, 10:18 AM | #22 |
Join Date: Jan 2014
|
Re: "Less-lethal" Gurps
My copy reads "Whenever an attack that inflicts impaling, piercing, or
tight-beam burning damage" (HT162). So it seems like the body hits rule does apply to tight-beam burning. |
08-09-2015, 10:38 AM | #23 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: "Less-lethal" Gurps
Huh. So it does, I've had that wrong.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
Tags |
combat, lethality |
|
|