07-14-2018, 03:43 PM | #31 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
07-14-2018, 03:50 PM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
And it is denser than muscle fibres too. Okey then could spidersilk be used to upgrade muscle fibres somehow?
|
07-14-2018, 03:52 PM | #33 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
Research is ongoing now, welcome to TL 8.
__________________
Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. -RAH |
|
07-14-2018, 03:52 PM | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
Since spidersilk is denser than muscle fibres, what do you think about using it to upgrade muscle fibres somehow? |
|
07-14-2018, 03:56 PM | #35 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
So far we have got: Spidersilk biomimetic muscle (by Ze'Manel Cunha) ST+1 (or more) Stimulating bone cell growth ST+1 In principle I do not need anything else, but if you feel like it, we can continue trying to discover how to push the limits a bit more so the girls can be a bit shorter. Come with another ST+1 and I will make them 174 cm height! Last edited by Alonsua; 07-14-2018 at 04:06 PM. |
|
07-14-2018, 04:06 PM | #36 |
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Luxembourg
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
If you really want to increase body weight to 360+ lbs while keeping an athletic body shape and an height of 188, I don't think any biological improvement will suffice.
Let's say you have a sculpted body at 240 lbs. About half is water, so you would need to somehow double the density of the remaining 35 lb of bone and 85 of flesh. I think that is unlikely. Either you increase the height or the solution is going to involve a couple dm3 of Osmium or Gold. (If you could get around the toxicity, replacing the body water with heavy water would give you about 10 lb of weight...) |
07-14-2018, 04:10 PM | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
I can face the toxicity with Immunity to a Specific Poison (Heavy Water). Last edited by Alonsua; 07-14-2018 at 04:22 PM. |
|
07-14-2018, 04:25 PM | #38 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
The thing is that water is the solvent for nearly all biochemical reactions. Put your enzymes into heavy water and its properties as a solvent are just a bit different.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
07-14-2018, 04:39 PM | #39 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
Quote:
Water´s main functions in the human body should involve acting as a solvent for several processes. How different do you think heavy water would be? Would not Immunity (Heavy Water) cover those differences with upgraded enzymes, for example? Or maybe there is a chance to develop a fluid denser and equally/more efficient than water? |
|
07-14-2018, 04:43 PM | #40 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Biotech: Help me justify good looking females with high strength values
The real problem with heavy water is that it's completely useless for solving your problem; it doesn't form chemical bonds that are meaningfully stronger than ordinary hydrogen, and that's what actually determines how strong a material is.
|
|
|