10-29-2010, 07:11 PM | #91 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Flushing, Michigan
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
|
10-29-2010, 07:48 PM | #92 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
I believe I included an exception for the supernatural. Of course, I don't believe in souls, but if they existed, it would be possible that AIs can't have them.
|
10-29-2010, 07:56 PM | #93 | |
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
Quote:
To say that biochemistry is sufficient is guesswork. Likewise, citing superntural forces is also at this stage mostly meaningless, we appear to be like medieval sages trying to figure out how a nuclear reactor works. We don't even know the right questions to ask yet. I chose the nuclear reactor model for a reason, to a student in, say, 1299 (the High Middle Ages) a fission reactor might as well be supernatural, would talk of particles like electrons and protons, orders of magnitude too small to perceive directly, interacting by means of electrical 'forces', and also by a 'strong force' that never impinges on the sensory world, and being simultaneously a wave and a particle and having a 'location' that can be said to be spread over a region until you measure it, be any less 'supernatural' than talk of spirits in the fuel mass? Oh, and yes, the reactor does turn one kind of metal into other materials, but no, it's not alchemy...well, depending on how you define alchemy...no, it's not cursed, but yes, you will die if you stand inside this circle around the reactor, from no visible form of harm... Sometimes, the only currently scientifically meaningful description of a process is "nobody knows how it works'. |
|
10-29-2010, 08:15 PM | #94 |
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
|
10-29-2010, 08:25 PM | #95 | |
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
Quote:
To use my 'fission reactor in 1299' analogy again: "We duplicated the machine, everything is exactly the same except the metal the sorceror used, but lead is almost the same density, almost the same weight, there MUST be a way to make this work with some other metal than this 'uranium'." In fact, they could try endless variations of metals that seem superficially like uranium (assuming they had access to them), even metals from uranium's column on the periodic table, and it's just not gonna work, even if they somehow managed to duplicate the machinery. Heck, not only do they have to have uranium, but they have to have 'special magic uranium', i.e. U-235 or U-233. Imagine trying to even explain what the difference is to someone with their frame of reference. When you can't even define the phenomenon you're trying to duplicate, you're off the bad start at figuring out what you can and can't do. Maybe AI is impossible, or maybe it can be done on the proper electronic system...or maybe it can only be done on organic, protein-based hardware. Or maybe it requires something as totally outside our frame of reference as neutrons and gamma rays would be to someone in 1299. We just don't know. Last edited by Johnny1A.2; 10-29-2010 at 08:39 PM. |
|
10-29-2010, 08:40 PM | #96 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
|
10-29-2010, 08:48 PM | #97 |
Join Date: Feb 2007
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
|
10-29-2010, 10:54 PM | #98 | |
Join Date: May 2005
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
Quote:
Anthony estimates 10 bytes per synapse; it's about 5 just to index which neuron it connects to, and that's probably an overestimate because gray matter neurons mostly connect short-range. But then the placement of the synapse relative to the cell body may have some significance, and each synapse can be excitatory or inhibitory, and each cell has its own action potential threshold and rate of fire, so a total of 10 bytes per synapse may be about right I think in this context "supernatural" means that there is some undiscovered fundamental law of nature that is significant in how the brain operates. There is no compelling evidence of this: neurons really seem to obey ordinary everyday rules of chemistry. "Quantum computing" is sometimes invoked but that is neither necessary nor plausible to explain what the brain does: as eminent consciousness researcher Christoph Koch once put it, the brain would make a lousy quantum computer because it is quite thoroughly entangled with its environment. The brain has to be robust enough to operate reliably in a 310K thermal bath, which pretty much rules out most exotic physics and quantum woo, and rules in conventional chemistry. In all humility we might be completely and entirely deluded about how everything works, but that's not a very useful working hypothesis. Oh wait, the thread's about spiders... I love 'em! I'd definitely play a silk-spinning brain-egg-laying PC. And the centipede's adorable too. My wife's also fond of spiders but terrified of snakes, go figure... TeV |
|
10-30-2010, 12:29 AM | #99 | ||
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The plutonium rich regions of Washington State
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
Quote:
Quote:
Toxicon Volume 19, Issue 6, 1981, Pages 831-839 The toxic Duvernoy's secretion of the wandering garter snake, Thamnophis elegans vagrans Darwin K. Vest Abstract The Duvernoy's secretion of the wandering garter snake (Thamnophis elegans vagrans) is highly toxic to mice, causing marked hemorrhaging in the lungs, diaphragm, mesentery and stomach lining, as well as mild local hemorrhaging. Systemic hemorrhaging was most pronounced in mice receiving doses approximating the p. ld50, while doses two times the ld50 or greater produced massive hermorrhaging in the lungs and diaphragm only. Local extravasations were directly proportional to dose. Oral secretions other than Duvernoy's secretion failed to produce lethal effects in mice challenged with doses up to 7 times the ld50 of Duvernoy's secretion. A micro-aspiration techniques for the collection of Duvernoy's secretion from colubrid snakes is described, and liquid as well as dried secretion yields for Thamnophis elegans vagrans are presented. and Clinical Toxicology, Volume 18, Number 5 (1981) Envenomation Following the Bite of a Wandering Garter Snake (Thamnophis elegans vagrans) Darwin K. Vest In some sense, the second article listed here was my first academic publication. Not as author, but as subject. In the article is a photograph of my 9 year old hand, puffy and swollen from the venom injected by a garter snake bite. The symptoms subsided after about three days, and disappeared after a week, but in the meantime my hand turned all sorts of interesting colors and ached quite a bit. I had been out catching snakes in the horse pasture behind our house, found one, grabbed it, and it grabbed me in return. I had been bitten many times before, so I didn't panic. Instead, I set out for the water trough (an old bathtub sitting in the marshy area) so I could stick its head underwater so that it would let go. In the meantime, it hung on and chewed. That was a mistake - just letting it go probably would have made it let go as well, and garter snakes do not have a very effective venom deliver mechanism - the only way they can get venom into the wound is if they hang on and chew. By the time I got home my hand was doing its polychromatic swelling routine. Mom panicked and, in desperation, called the local university. By an amazing coincidence, she got ahold of a graduate student who was doing his doctoral work on the toxic properties of garter snake venom. I think the quote was "Your son was envenomated by a garter snake Mrs. Campbell? That's great! Err, I mean I'll be right over ...". At the time, I was one of only two people on record to have been envenomated by a garter snake, and the first guy declined to be interviewed. So, it is a fun story to tell, but for all practical purposes they are harmless and you can pretty much just leave them alone without fear of anything bad happening to you. Luke |
||
10-30-2010, 01:14 AM | #100 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte, North Caroline, United States of America, Earth?
|
Re: Would a 9 lb sapient spider producing 1/10 lb of silk a day suspend your disbelie
Ya learn something new every day. So Garter snakes are venomous?
__________________
Hydration is key |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|