07-12-2019, 10:56 AM | #11 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
Quote:
Modern knives often look like something an orc would carry. The fashion often leans toward the rather ugly. I'm glad I still like Victorinox; everyone knows what it is. It is not really a weapon but it is reassuring to have on hand (my personal weapon is a brace of kubatons that can brain any burglar that climbs through my window and by-the-way over my bed).
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
|
07-12-2019, 10:59 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth, mostly
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
The question of sumptuary laws can be applied on other settings as well, for what might feel like a jarring (yet logical) result.
A postapocalyptic setting, for instance, in which a local warlord has decreed that anyone carrying a firearm above a given caliber or capable of full-auto fire must pay a tax of (fairly large amount of local currency) or face arrest by his extremely well-armed constabulary. (They might even have been provisioned from folks who tried to fight back when the tax was demanded!) There's a lesser tax for carrying semi-auto, or swords/axes above a certain size. The custom may have originated as a matter of sheer practicality, as the warlord sought to disarm any possible opposition to his/her reign, but become (as it did in the real world) a status symbol - "I'm so rich, I can afford to carry around this hundred-year-old M-4!"
__________________
If you break the laws of Man, you go to prison. If you break the laws of God, you go to Hell. If you break the laws of Physics, you go to Sweden and receive a Nobel Prize. |
07-12-2019, 11:34 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
There also might be something that isn't exactly the same as a sumptuary law. Suppose the military gave out swords as a decoration or a symbol of rank? Perhaps in that case the generic "sword" might not be forbidden (because to do so would be a sumptuary law) but a sword identified in a particular way (because it is trademarked).
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
07-12-2019, 04:55 PM | #14 |
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
Social status can be important. We played a GURPS campaign set in 1930 England, when the weapon laws were theoretically fairly loose, but it depended in practice who you were.
Only one character, the only one with Status above 0, had a gun, and she only carried it occasionally. Another had Social Stigma (Second-Class Citizen), and while she carried a knife, it was well-concealed, and she took great care not to be near anything that might be considered illegal. There were only two fights that left evidence afterwards IIRC, one against monsters so horrific-looking that the police didn't ask awkward questions, and the other which resulted in us calling the police to hand over someone who'd clearly been trying to murder us (set fire to the house, lurk down the road with a rifle) but had acquired two broken legs.
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
07-12-2019, 10:58 PM | #15 |
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New Zealand.
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
In a more "gamey" section of my fantasy world I've been running things with "How good an impression did you make with the guards".
If the PCs offend the guards in any way (social disadvantges or their own actions etc) the guards tend to exclude the character(s) in question from the town/city. There are no fixed societal rules either way, the decision is left to the guards for good or ill. Heros with a good reputation can swagger about armed to the teeth but shadey types get harassed by the powers that be. Given that in most cases the communities are small enough that word about a particular guard's decision will get about.
__________________
Waiting for inspiration to strike...... And spending too much time thinking about farming for RPGs Contributor to Citadel at Nordvörn Last edited by (E); 07-12-2019 at 11:01 PM. |
07-12-2019, 11:19 PM | #16 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
In some mediaeval times and places peasants were forbidden to own weapons and armour. In others, they were required by law to own them.
One can imagine a setting of Kafkaesque satire in which people are required to bear arms at all times, and liable to be shot by the police if they believe that you are unarmed. People of high status would be able to get away with discreet pocket pistols, but anyone with a social stigma would have to carry a longarm to make it obvious that they were armed.
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
07-12-2019, 11:23 PM | #17 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
One detail that may escape American audiences is that carrying a weapon is almost never a *right*. Pretty much every prince ever would claim the authority to regulate or forbid weapons to anybody if they wanted to, and few political theorists would disagree. If they are not doing so, it's a liberty they are allowing, not a right inherent to you.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
07-15-2019, 04:40 AM | #18 | |
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
Quote:
|
|
07-15-2019, 09:54 AM | #19 | |
Join Date: Sep 2018
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
Quote:
This sort of limits weapons to the wealthy citizens that will complain the most about being unarmed and who are less likely to engage in criminal acts. It puts strangers and ne'er-do-wells at a disadvantage against tax payers. And it creates a small obligation to the most wealthy and independent citizens in the realm. If it means they stab a few peasants in bar fights or occasionally kill someone they thought was a robber, it seems like a small price. |
|
07-15-2019, 11:03 AM | #20 |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: The rights and consequences to bear arms in RPGs
And in a particularly grim setting, you could be required to present your weapons upon request. Any refusal to do so is seen as unreadiness to defend the territory, and thus treason. Any attempt to do so is seen as brandishing a weapon in the presence of a civil authority, and thus treason.
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
|
|