|
08-24-2016, 03:36 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Apr 2015
|
[Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
As my parties designated buff wizard, I have been working on a spell to help our party members resist the magic effects of other wizards. I settled on afflicting magic resistance 10, which accomplishes everything I want it to. However, a question arose about afflicting magic resistance on a wizard. Magic Resistance as written does not allow characters with magery (Sorcerous Empowerment) to have it, and if you have magic resistance you cannot cast spells.
If I afflict an enemy (or friendly for that matter) mage with magic resistance, do they immediately lose the ability to cast spells? It seems like the proper way would be to make an affliction that negated the Sorcerous Empowerment advantage, but then what happens when they have magic resistance afflicted upon them?
__________________
I run a low fantasy GURPS game: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdo...YLkfnhr3vYXpFg World details on Obsidian Portal: https://the-fall-of-brekhan.obsidian...ikis/main-page |
08-24-2016, 04:19 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
I believe you're correct that it would disable all Magery and Sorcerous Empowerment if successful. Do note that the subject would get a HT roll to resist, and Sorcery Talent should would probably be allowed to add to HT for this (in which case, use the higher of Talent and Empowerment as spells do to resist dispelling, which would make high-power sorcerers really hard to shut down this way). Also note that DR will also add to this resistance roll unless it's done as a Malediction.
__________________
My blog: All my hobbies, all the time |
08-24-2016, 04:24 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Feb 2014
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
According to RAW, it seems that way, of course would the addition of 10 levels of magic resistance trigger another save against your magic (thus canceling it once cast on anyone)?
I have never liked the concept of magic resistance as personal null-magic. It seems a better fit for creatures so magical they have extra magical defenses. Has anyone every statted out the value of MR that doesn't disable magery? |
08-24-2016, 06:36 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
Quote:
As for Afflicting MR to a mage? I'd just say they're at a penalty equal to their MR, and the trade-off is that they're resistant to hostile mages. |
|
08-25-2016, 11:44 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Apr 2015
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
Quote:
One thing that my groups discussion has lead to is the concept of a counter-counter spell. Afflicting yourself with a small amount of MR (Allows own spellcasting +150%) should make it very difficult for an enemy mage to deny you your own casting powers (MR 3 would be a 6 point difference in the quick contest, for example). Fights might all start with mages casting their defensive spells first (before another mage has the ability to deny it to them), then they switch to buff/offensive spells. I have one more question about how talents would apply in the above case though. When afflicting MR upon someone they can choose to resist, and assuming it's a malediction the roll is Will+talent vs HT. If a mage gives themselves a defensive magic resistance buff (of MR 3 in this case) is the roll now (Will + Enemy Talent - 3 vs HT + 3) OR (Will + Enemy Talent - 3 vs HT + Your Talent +3)
__________________
I run a low fantasy GURPS game: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdo...YLkfnhr3vYXpFg World details on Obsidian Portal: https://the-fall-of-brekhan.obsidian...ikis/main-page |
|
08-25-2016, 04:32 PM | #6 |
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
Your roll to cast Flight on yourself would be at the penalty. If you can soak the -10 to cast it, sure, go for it.
|
08-25-2016, 04:41 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Apr 2015
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
Using sorcery there isn't any roll though. I simply give myself the advantage and pay the 1 FP cost. Unless I added unreliable or some such limitation there isn't anywhere for a partial penalty to be applied.
__________________
I run a low fantasy GURPS game: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdo...YLkfnhr3vYXpFg World details on Obsidian Portal: https://the-fall-of-brekhan.obsidian...ikis/main-page |
08-25-2016, 12:20 PM | #8 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
|
08-24-2016, 04:24 PM | #9 | ||
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portsmouth, VA, USA
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
Quote:
Quote:
That seems unnecessarily complex to me.
__________________
My Twitter My w23 Stuff My Blog Latest GURPS Book: Dungeon Fantasy Denizens: Thieves Latest TFT Book: The Sunken Library Become a Patron! |
||
08-24-2016, 05:17 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA
|
Re: [Sorcery] Afflicting Magic Resistance
I liked how the version in Magic only applied a casting penalty equal to the MR to the target rather than completely removing their abilities. But that is harder to set up using advantages.
Personally, I prefer using Neutralize, Mana-Damper, and Static as the base advantage for anti-magic spells since these advantages are explicitly for power negation. While I'm reluctant to do so, I might allow this build. Firstly, the target does get a chance to resist. Since the spell is targeting the sorcerer's abilities directly, I would use Rindis's suggestion of increasing the sorcerer's resistance. Secondly, unlike the above bases this method is vulnerable to being dispelled. |
Tags |
affliction, magic resistance, resistance, sorcery |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|