Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2005, 10:16 PM   #1
copeab
 
copeab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
Default Troop Strength values for assorted vehicles

A couple of years ago, I had come up with TS values (for the GURPS mass combat system in Compendium II and Roleplayer #30) for most of the WWII vehicles in the G:WWII line and those I had personally done. I haven't really updated it since, but I thought I would post it here.

tanks and tank destroyers
Panzer I - 10
Panzer IIC - 15
Panzer IIF/J - 20
Panzer IIIF - 25
M-3 Stuart - 25
Panzerjager I - 25
T-70 - 25
StuG III - 25
Panzer IIIJ - 30
Panzer IVD - 30
StuG IV - 30
SU-76 - 30
M-4A1 Sherman - 35
SOMUA S-35 - 35
PzKfw IV/70 - 35
Hetzer - 35
Matilda II - 35
M-10 Wolverine - 40
Panzer IVH - 40
Char B1-bis - 40
Cromwell VII - 40
M-18 Hellcat - 40
M-36 Jackson - 45
M-4A3E8 Sherman - 45
Panther D - 50
T-34/76 - 50
T-34/85 - 55
Tiger - 60
Jagdtiger - 70
Tiger II - 70
Maus - 80

armored cars
M-20 - 10
SdKfz 222 - 15
SdKfz 231 - 20
M-8 - 20
SdKfz 234 - 25

sp artillery
sIG 33 - 50
Wespe - 90
M-7 Priest - 100
M-8 HMC - 30
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com
copeab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2005, 12:49 PM   #2
Staten
 
Staten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bergen, Norway
Default Re: Troop Strength values for assorted vehicles

Hmmm.... Now, there are some complicating matters when it comes to the comparative value of AFVs. For instance, a T34/85 does not have the firepower to take down a Panther head on; Likewise with the Mathilda II vs the Pz III.

But this could be solved by giving bonuses for superiority in "Heavy front armour" or "Long AT guns", in the regular fashion.
__________________
Yours
Elling


"You shall shun manslying, lest it be a justified reprimand, or in common combat."
-Advice for royal Retainers,
The Kingsmirror, ca 1250
Staten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2005, 03:47 PM   #3
copeab
 
copeab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
Default Re: Troop Strength values for assorted vehicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Staten
Hmmm.... Now, there are some complicating matters when it comes to the comparative value of AFVs. For instance, a T34/85 does not have the firepower to take down a Panther head on; Likewise with the Mathilda II vs the Pz III.

But this could be solved by giving bonuses for superiority in "Heavy front armour" or "Long AT guns", in the regular fashion.
Remember that in the basic Mass Combat system, tanks just get a 25 (light), 40 (medium) or 60 (heavy).

All the numbers are subjective. At one time, I had created a crude formula that took into account (off-road) speed, (frontal and side) armor and armament in an objective way, but it has been lost to the mists of time.
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com

Last edited by copeab; 08-11-2005 at 07:53 PM.
copeab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2005, 05:17 PM   #4
KataH
 
KataH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Default Re: Troop Strength values for assorted vehicles

Very cool info. I might even give them a try. Gives me a great idea for a gaming session for my group.
__________________
KataH

"Follow me if I advance! Kill me if I retreat! Avenge me if I die!"
KataH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2005, 01:09 AM   #5
copeab
 
copeab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
Default Re: Troop Strength values for assorted vehicles

Some other random stuff:

I did consider taking the costs of vehicles from Steel Panthers and tweaking them until they fell into the Mass Combat ranges. However, since I wanted to share this project with others, for copyright reasons I decided not to use those numbers.

I didn't do anything with aircraft. Because of the way aircraft interact with the MC system, it was hard to tell what a 'fighter' and 'bomber' were supposed to represent. Was a bomber a level bomber like the B-17 or a dive-bomber like the Ju 87? Was a fighter a straight fighter like the Me 109 or a fighter-bomber like the P-47? Probably, aircraft should be rated on a (roughly) 50-100 scale based on their effectiveness in ground support, but that can be argued against.
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com
copeab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
mass combat, wwii

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.