03-09-2020, 06:45 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
|
Re: Dark Flame
I would question a fire elemental's ability to carry anything.
Only tangentially related, Interestingly, I've been working on a new monster called Black Fire. When I read your thread title I thought for a moment that we had somehow tuned into the same wavelength of the zeitgeist. |
03-16-2020, 03:26 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Re: Dark Flame
As per ITL 19, Darkness only "Extinguishes all artificial lights (including
Light spells) within its range". Light is intrinsic to the flames of a Fire Elemental and so should not be affected by Darkness...
__________________
Helborn |
03-16-2020, 09:51 PM | #5 |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Dark Flame
If elementals are really creatures of the essence of their element, then one might think they're the least artificial of all fires. So not affected by things that only affect artificial light propagation.
I agree with Shostak that I don't think they can carry anything. |
03-17-2020, 07:35 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Re: Dark Flame
|
03-17-2020, 11:42 AM | #8 | |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Dark Flame
Quote:
I don't follow any of that. Are you trying to communicate in Cobbese? |
|
03-18-2020, 04:26 AM | #9 | |
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Re: Dark Flame
Quote:
"The question of whether machines can think is about as relevant as the question of whether submarines can swim." is an Edsger Dijkstra aphorism. I'm saying it doesn't matter whether the fire elemental is invisible or not. It's dark. We can't see it. Does that make it invisible? Does a submarine swim? Who knows? More importantly, who cares? I could have thrown in "a tree falls in the forest", maybe that would have made it clearer. Last edited by David Bofinger; 03-18-2020 at 04:28 AM. Reason: typo |
|
03-18-2020, 11:09 AM | #10 |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Dark Flame
Wow, ok, thanks.
Though I'm sticking with: elementals aren't artificial so aren't affected by Darkness. |
|
|