Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-22-2017, 11:12 AM   #1
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Currently, if you want to play a wolf (4 legs, cannot stand on its hind legs) you take NFM and 4 legs (total -25), whereas if you want to play a bear (4 legs, can stand on its hind legs) you take NFM and semi-upright (total -40). This seems wrong -- the bear is getting a bigger discount for something that's better.

My tentative thought: NFM changes the value of semi-upright and one arm to [-5]; if you have no arms, it is worth [-40] total. This does change the point value of all quadrupeds, though. Maybe add some 10 point advantage, such as:
Quadruped Balance: you roll vs skill, not skill-2, to kick. You get +4 to DX and DX-based skill rolls to keep your feet or avoid being knocked down (recovering from a kick or pounce, resisting a takedown or slam).
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.

Last edited by Anthony; 11-22-2017 at 11:26 AM.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 12:16 PM   #2
ericthered
Hero of Democracy
 
ericthered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

The bear should also take 4 legs, and the wolf should take horizontal (-10 points)
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic

Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog

Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one!
ericthered is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2017, 12:43 PM   #3
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthered View Post
The bear should also take 4 legs, and the wolf should take horizontal (-10 points)
Hm. I'm not convinced that semi-upright requires you to take 4 legs, the bear on B456 doesn't have it, but yes, I'd forgotten about horizontal (and oops, semi-upright is only -5).
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 04:53 AM   #4
whswhs
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

The wolf seems to have Extra Legs (Three or four legs) [5], Horizontal [-10]], and No Fine Manipulators [-30], for a net -35 points.

The Bear seems to have Extra Legs (Three or four legs) [5], Ham-Fisted 2 [-10], Semi-Upright [-5], and to have sold back its base two arms [-40] but bought them again with the Temporary Disadvantage No Extra Legs, -5% [38]. That looks like a net -12 points.

I'm not sure that's right, as it seems to give the bear rather too small a negative cost compared with the wolf, but that's my first try at doing it de novo.
__________________
Bill Stoddard

I don't think we're in Oz any more.
whswhs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 12:42 PM   #5
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by whswhs View Post
The wolf seems to have Extra Legs (Three or four legs) [5], Horizontal [-10]], and No Fine Manipulators [-30], for a net -35 points.

The Bear seems to have Extra Legs (Three or four legs) [5], Ham-Fisted 2 [-10], Semi-Upright [-5], and to have sold back its base two arms [-40] but bought them again with the Temporary Disadvantage No Extra Legs, -5% [38]. That looks like a net -12 points.

I'm not sure that's right, as it seems to give the bear rather too small a negative cost compared with the wolf, but that's my first try at doing it de novo.
The bear doesn't have ham-fisted, it has no fine manipulators. 'You have no body parts more agile than paws or hooves'.

Both semi-upright and horizontal should probably include "your forelimbs can function as legs" and thus make extra legs unnecessary. Note that Vermiform (B263) does not include Horizontal.
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 05:40 PM   #6
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Pandas are unique for evolving a pseudo-thumb. So they may qualify for ham-fisted, but not any other bears.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2017, 10:08 PM   #7
AlexanderHowl
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Then they could not qualify for No Fine Manipulators.
AlexanderHowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2017, 01:35 AM   #8
JoelSammallahti
 
JoelSammallahti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

The bear in Dungeon Fantasy has Ham-Fisted, because it's a crazy fantasy bear.

There are a few problems with these morphology traits; I think they weren't quite fully thought through when 4e was in production. For example, Horizontal is -10 but there are no negative effects for it if you have claws. Some of the Martial Arts rules pertaining to these traits also get weird if you have unusual combinations instead of the typical Extra Legs, NFM and Horizontal, if I recall correctly. Also, quadrupeds' front claw attacks are listed as punches (thr-1 damage, no penalty) rather than kicks (thr damage, -2 to attack) even though they're done with legs, which is something I griped about years ago, obsessive nerd style. :D
JoelSammallahti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2017, 02:32 AM   #9
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoelSammallahti View Post
The bear in Dungeon Fantasy has Ham-Fisted, because it's a crazy fantasy bear.
Not in my copy (pdf)..
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2017, 11:28 AM   #10
sir_pudding
Wielder of Smart Pants
 
sir_pudding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
Default Re: No Fine Manipulators and No Arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
Both semi-upright and horizontal should probably include "your forelimbs can function as legs" and thus make extra legs unnecessary. Note that Vermiform (B263) does not include Horizontal.
If you don't have Extra Legs you can't tripod if you lose one. You can have four legs and not the Extra Legs advantage. If, when you lose a leg you fall down, you don't have Extra Legs.

Last edited by sir_pudding; 11-24-2017 at 12:28 PM.
sir_pudding is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.