06-21-2018, 11:52 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Restricting Variable Enhancement
I understand why Variable Enhancement, as written, costs ten times as much as the largest Enhancement hit allows: being able to use any Enhancement is powerful. But can you limit it to restrict the range of Enhancements it allows?
I don't see this coming up very often; but every once in a while, you get an Enhancement that actually represents a whole class of Enhancements, such as Affliction's “Advantage” Enhancement. Could I go with a lower cost for an Affliction that can grant any physical or mental Advantage but can't impose Disadvantages, Negated Advantages, Attribute Penalties, Irritants, Incapacitations, or Mortal Conditions? Could I go with an even lower cost if I further restricted it to, say, mental Advantages, mundane Advantages, or both? Let's say I'm making a super who can lend his Abilities to others: would I have to write up each Ability twice, once as normal and a second time as an Affliction? Or could I write up a single Affliction with a Variable Enhancement that's restricted to “Advantage (any of my other Abilities)”? |
06-21-2018, 12:24 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
I think limiting Variable Enhancement is pretty reasonable, if it's not fully variable. I've used such builds in the past. As for the value of the limitation, I'd take a page from Modular Abilities, the "trait-limited" limitation, and go with something like this:
|
06-21-2018, 12:36 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
I wouldn't go there, but I can see an Accessibility limitation on the Enhancement as a way to reduce its cost that gives you some guidelines to work with.
If your looking for a way to ge more variety a less cost the two methods I use the most are... 1) Temporary Enhancements from GURPS Powers. Cheap but FP heavy in use. 2) Alternative Enhancements from GURPS Power Ups: Enhancements which I LOVE, specially for Afflictions. Cost per additional 'ability' winds up being just a few points each, very similar to spells as skills. Hmm how about SAS Magic for the default system name? EDIT: Written before Kelly Pedersons idea which I'm now digesting.
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
06-21-2018, 12:50 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
I like Alternative Advantages, except that it only works for a finite and predetermined list of Enhancements: so if I wanted to be able to use Affliction to grant any mundane mental Advantage, I'd have to add up the costs of every mundane mental Advantage in the game except for the single most expensive one, divide that cost by 5, add the most expensive one to the total, multiply the result by +10%, and hope that it comes in under +100% (what I'd pay for Variable Advantage, which is overkill). Temporary Enhancements is a possibility, if I make use of an appropriate option to make it available; but it's also overkill as there are no restrictions on what Enhancements you can add using it.
“SAS Magic”? Where did that come from? |
06-21-2018, 12:51 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
Before Variable Enhancement was on the books, we used a Modular Ability limited to "Only to add Affliction specific enhancements on a curse-appropriate theme to my Affliction", for a character with a wide variety of curse effects (a crone demi-deity).
It was exceedingly effective, to the point where I'm pretty gun-shy on Variable Enhancement being used for basically the same thing.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
06-21-2018, 03:33 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
Quote:
Alternative Enhancements on Affliction in a DF game seems to work pretty well though. When I first considered going from AA to AE for Affliction the increase in number of effective spells made me think it might be too good. However breaking it down per ability makes it still more expensive than the normal spell casting system. In some cases its more effective regarding range, duration and FP cost but that is a different issue/thread and due to the nature of Affliction not how you get more for less cost.
__________________
My GURPS publications GURPS Powers: Totem and Nature Spirits; GURPS Template Toolkit 4: Spirits; Pyramid articles. Buying them lets us know you want more! My GURPS fan contribution and blog: REFPLace GURPS Landing Page My List of GURPS You Tube videos (plus a few other useful items) My GURPS Wiki entries |
|
06-21-2018, 03:59 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
Am I missing something or did someone screw up and use the same name for two different enhancements? The Variable enhancement that I am familiar with is +5% (Characters, p. 109) and only regulates the level of an attack.
|
06-21-2018, 06:25 PM | #8 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Restricting Variable Enhancement
One enhancement is named 'variable'. The other is named 'variable enhancement'.
|
|
|