Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2015, 04:11 PM   #1
philosophyguy
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Default Should Evaluate be worth +2?

The Evaluate maneuver seems underpowered in combat. Compare two options: take an Evaluate maneuver and then attack, versus attack and then attack again on your next turn.

You are more likely to get a hit by attacking twice than by evaluating and attacking if your effective skill is 6 or higher (and you might even get a second hit by attacking twice!) So, evaluating is only useful if your effective skill is 5 or less.

If Evaluate were worth +2, then you would be more likely to get at least one hit with Evaluate (as opposed to attacking twice) if your effective skill is 9 or less—a far more useful range of effective skills—and the bonus is somewhere between 4% and 8%, which doesn't seem overpowering.

The only possible problem I can see with making Evaluate +2 is if it were stacked multiple turns in a row, but limiting the bonus to +1 for each second after the first seems to mitigate that problem.

Are there other reasons why Evaluate should be limited to +1?
philosophyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 04:19 PM   #2
DouglasCole
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
 
DouglasCole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lakeville, MN
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophyguy View Post
The Evaluate maneuver seems underpowered in combat. Compare two options: take an Evaluate maneuver and then attack, versus attack and then attack again on your next turn.

You are more likely to get a hit by attacking twice than by evaluating and attacking if your effective skill is 6 or higher (and you might even get a second hit by attacking twice!) So, evaluating is only useful if your effective skill is 5 or less.

If Evaluate were worth +2, then you would be more likely to get at least one hit with Evaluate (as opposed to attacking twice) if your effective skill is 9 or less—a far more useful range of effective skills—and the bonus is somewhere between 4% and 8%, which doesn't seem overpowering.

The only possible problem I can see with making Evaluate +2 is if it were stacked multiple turns in a row, but limiting the bonus to +1 for each second after the first seems to mitigate that problem.

Are there other reasons why Evaluate should be limited to +1?
There was a flurry of discussion of Evaluate about a year ago, including a "Melee Academy" collection of posts. You might mine those for inspiration to start.
__________________
My blog:Gaming Ballistic, LLC
My Store: Gaming Ballistic on Shopify
My Patreon: Gaming Ballistic on Patreon
DouglasCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 04:40 PM   #3
Landwalker
 
Landwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cumberland, ME
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

To echo a somewhat side-comment made by Douglas Cole in his own linked post, the answer (I have found) is The Last Gasp rules. These really take the edge off the "attack every second, non-stop, forever" approach and mentality—doing that is a good way to exhaust yourself and then get killed, and Evaluate becomes an extremely valuable and tactically important option.
Landwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 05:01 PM   #4
Anaraxes
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Landwalker View Post
The Last Gasp... Evaluate becomes an extremely valuable and tactically important option.
Because you're Evaluating, or because it becomes the "Rest" Maneuver?
Anaraxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 05:17 PM   #5
weby
 
weby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

I have used evaluate to be +2/second with a +4 maximum for quite a long time with no found drawbacks.

It is still extremely rare for people to take it, but now it is maybe "twice in a blue moon" instead of the previous "once in a blue moon".

So for players to see a benefit in it it should likely be even more... But sticking with the +2 for now.
__________________
--
GURPS spaceship unofficial errata and thoughts: https://gsuc.roto.nu/
weby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 05:49 PM   #6
evileeyore
Banned
 
evileeyore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

The only time I've seen Evaluate used was by invisible or nigh-invisible PCs setting up a melee ambush.

I've never seen it used in the heat. If a PC was missing due to low skill they either run away or find some other way to contribute to a fight.
evileeyore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 07:01 PM   #7
trooper6
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

I was playing in an arena game that was pure combat...and Evaluate was used surprisingly often. Usually at the beginning of the fight as we were maneuvering to get into range. I'd say almost every fight started with Evaluate maneuvers. Evaluate would also come up within combat for attackers who had reach.
trooper6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 10:38 PM   #8
Dustin
 
Dustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The former Chochenyo territory
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

I don't think it breaks anything to make it +2. I've been toying with a houserule to make it +1 on your next attack, but also +1 on your defenses against that opponent.

I believe Kromm is on record that Evaluate isn't intended to be competitive with other maneuvers in the middle of a fight, it's intended more for situations where you can't attack yet for some reason, so what do you do?
__________________
My gaming blog: Thor's Grumblings
Keep your friends close, and your enemies in Close Combat.
Dustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2015, 11:04 PM   #9
trooper6
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Medford, MA
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

Evaluate also helps against feints...which was useful in the arena game because feints were not uncommon.
trooper6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 01:57 AM   #10
Dingle
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ireland
Default Re: Should Evaluate be worth +2?

in the case of low point games with skill ~14, medium shields, and combat reflexes, retreating defenses are close to combat skill.
In this case, at least one of feint or evaluate is worth it as the chances of hitting without them are low.

Evaluate followed by feint has a good chance of turning the evaluate bonus into a defense penalty, which in turn leads to a decisive hit.
Dingle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
combat, evaluate

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.