Take me! Take me!

munchkin-noob · 04-12-2009, 09:35 PM

Recent game, this situation led to a very heated arguement. Player opened the door and drew the Kudzu plant. Couldn't beat it on her own, and was going to run away because the bad stuff wouldn't have effected her anyways. Before she rolled, another player plays Take me! Take me!, forcing her to accept his help. He couldn't beat it either, so he plays Ancient on it (adding +2 treasures, now for a total of 6) and follows that with Friendly, which forces the monster to give up the treasure.

His arguement (along with another player who agreed with him) was that the Friendly card gave him all the treasure (as the card says, "the monster gives you the treasure") leaving none for the other player. That's another arguement in itself to me, but my arguement was that because Take me! Take me! specifically says "you cannot demand a reward," he is entitled to no treasure at all.

Opinions?

04-12-2009, 09:35 PM	#1
munchkin-noob Join Date: Mar 2009	Take me! Take me! Recent game, this situation led to a very heated arguement. Player opened the door and drew the Kudzu plant. Couldn't beat it on her own, and was going to run away because the bad stuff wouldn't have effected her anyways. Before she rolled, another player plays Take me! Take me!, forcing her to accept his help. He couldn't beat it either, so he plays Ancient on it (adding +2 treasures, now for a total of 6) and follows that with Friendly, which forces the monster to give up the treasure. His arguement (along with another player who agreed with him) was that the Friendly card gave him all the treasure (as the card says, "the monster gives you the treasure") leaving none for the other player. That's another arguement in itself to me, but my arguement was that because Take me! Take me! specifically says "you cannot demand a reward," he is entitled to no treasure at all. Opinions? Last edited by munchkin-noob; 04-12-2009 at 09:49 PM.