Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-19-2018, 04:07 PM   #71
afnord
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Iceland
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Weird double post.

Last edited by afnord; 03-19-2018 at 04:21 PM. Reason: Double post
afnord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2018, 04:19 PM   #72
afnord
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Iceland
Default Re: Increasing lethality

There are lots of ways to ramp up deadliness

1) Back to basics or 3rd ed. Death Saves at 1/2 HP. So if you have 10 HP then you make death save at -10 HP and again at -15 HP

2) Use penalties on Death Saves. At -2xHP you get a penalty of 1 on Death Saves that only get worse

3) Use the wounding wild die. There are rules for it's use somewhere. I call it the blood die that get's rolled alongside damage. You roll 1 and your opponent is in for a nasty suprise. It may hit the joint, arteries, vitals etc.

4) Aim for the vitals, it's only -2 in theory as miss by 1 is a hit.

5) 9mm is on average enough ruin your dodge if you have no armor and force you to roll for stun. If that happen then you are in heaps of trouble.

6) HT 12 character has a 20% chance to make 5 death rolls at no penalty, you'll get him in the long run.

See not hard to make Gurps deadly. IME Wild West/Victorian/1920s is one of the most deadly games in Gurps because of lack of armor. One good shot and your character is toast.
afnord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2018, 07:47 AM   #73
Ji ji
 
Ji ji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanW View Post
You could also say the initial wound must exceed at least HP/8 (rounded up), or some such number, to get bonus damage to the vitals. Maybe it could become HP/10 for Skinny, HP/6 for Fat, and HP/4 for Very Fat. That's just numbers off the top of my head, and first thing in the morning, so it might be a stupid idea after I'm fully awake.
A player of my team showed me his idea to revamp firearms rules and we are considering to use it for our current (mindless) dinosaur-hunting adventure.

He modeled penetration as bullet speed * sectional density; and wounding mod as bullet energy / penetration.
Vitals hit is not on a specific location, but any torso hit succesful by 3+. Wounding mod is reduced to x2 (proposal brought by me, after this thread).
A hit qualifies for vitals only if basic damage (after DR) is over HP/3.
Damage is rolled with no more than 3d, multiplied as needed.
High damage rolls and/or critical hits handle exceptional shots.

We are going to give it a try, but I already feel that it will work well.
Ji ji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2018, 10:54 PM   #74
Gollum
 
Gollum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ji ji View Post
[...] Wounding mod is reduced to x2 (proposal brought by me, after this thread). [...] Damage is rolled with no more than 3d, multiplied as needed.
If I did understand things well, there is a little problem here: it means that a sniper rifle .338 (9d+1 of damage) would inflict less damage by hiting the vitals than by hitting anywhere else in the torso... Unless "multiplied as needed" means that you would multiplied the 3d result by 3 before mutltiplying it by 2 for hitting the vitals, of course.

Last edited by Gollum; 03-26-2018 at 11:03 PM.
Gollum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 12:18 AM   #75
VonKatzen
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gollum View Post
If I did understand things well, there is a little problem here: it means that a sniper rifle .338 (9d+1 of damage) would inflict less damage by hiting the vitals than by hitting anywhere else in the torso... Unless "multiplied as needed" means that you would multiplied the 3d result by 3 before mutltiplying it by 2 for hitting the vitals, of course.
Given that a .338 (Lapua or Norma) stands a good chance of dropping a grizzly in one shot that is a big issue.
VonKatzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 02:21 AM   #76
Ji ji
 
Ji ji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gollum View Post
If I did understand things well, there is a little problem here: it means that a sniper rifle .338 (9d+1 of damage) would inflict less damage by hiting the vitals than by hitting anywhere else in the torso... Unless "multiplied as needed" means that you would multiplied the 3d result by 3 before mutltiplying it by 2 for hitting the vitals, of course.
Of course.
3d is used in order to keep a high SD. 9d+1 is rolled as 3d*3+1.
Ji ji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 04:49 AM   #77
Tomsdad
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ji ji View Post
Of course.
3d is used in order to keep a high SD. 9d+1 is rolled as 3d*3+1.
But I thought you were going to reduce the vital wounding mod to x2?

(and a vital hit would be decided by MoS)

maybe if you give an example of what happens is someone shoot's a ST10 / HP10 person on the torso with such a round

Cheers

TD

Last edited by Tomsdad; 03-27-2018 at 07:42 AM.
Tomsdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 05:03 AM   #78
Rupert
 
Rupert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
Default Re: Increasing lethality

I assume 9d+1 would become 3dx3+1 for a normal torso hit and 3dx6+2 for a vitals hit.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn

"A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history."
Rupert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 06:59 AM   #79
Ji ji
 
Ji ji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomsdad View Post
But I thought you were going to reduce dteh vital wounding mod to x2?

(and a vital hit would be decided by MoS)

maybe if you give an example of what happens is someone shoot's a ST10 / HP10 person on the torso with such a round

Cheers

TD
Rupert got it. Sorry if I have been unclear.

With the spreadsheet values, a .338 LM would be 10d damage, 1.9 wounding mod. Slightly different from HT values, but not much.
It translated to (3d+1)x3 on a normal hit.
If the torso hit is a success, you roll 3d+1, multiply by 3, and you get basic damage. After DR is subtracted, you multiply the damage by 1.9. To this point it’s close to normal rules, just different values.

Let’s say we rolled 12. Then it is (12+1)x3=39. DR is 0.
As HP is 10, 10 is delivered to the target and 29 is overpenetration.
10 is multiplied by wounding mod, so 10x1.9=19 HP lost. Ouch!

If the torso hit is a success by 3+, then it should be a vitals hit. Is the damage after DR above (HP/3)? That is, over 4. Yes, it is.
So you multiply 10 (damage before blow-through) by 1.9 (wounding mod) by 2 (vitals hit mod).
10x1.9x2=38 HP lost.

BTW, the bullet overpenetrate by 29, so it could possibly kill somebody standing behind even if he wears body armor with steel plates.

I tried a simulation of .375H&H and .500NE against cape buffalo and bush elephant and I got very good results. I suspect some strange (maybe, too realistic?) effect can happen in special circumstances with very fast bullets (300WM, Weatherby Magnums, Norma Magnums and such), I will check in game or as soon as I have more free time.

Last edited by Ji ji; 03-27-2018 at 07:02 AM.
Ji ji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2018, 08:02 AM   #80
Tomsdad
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton
Default Re: Increasing lethality

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ji ji View Post
Rupert got it. Sorry if I have been unclear.

With the spreadsheet values, a .338 LM would be 10d damage, 1.9 wounding mod. Slightly different from HT values, but not much.
It translated to (3d+1)x3 on a normal hit.
If the torso hit is a success, you roll 3d+1, multiply by 3, and you get basic damage. After DR is subtracted, you multiply the damage by 1.9. To this point it’s close to normal rules, just different values.

Let’s say we rolled 12. Then it is (12+1)x3=39. DR is 0.
As HP is 10, 10 is delivered to the target and 29 is overpenetration.
10 is multiplied by wounding mod, so 10x1.9=19 HP lost. Ouch!

If the torso hit is a success by 3+, then it should be a vitals hit. Is the damage after DR above (HP/3)? That is, over 4. Yes, it is.
So you multiply 10 (damage before blow-through) by 1.9 (wounding mod) by 2 (vitals hit mod).
10x1.9x2=38 HP lost.

BTW, the bullet overpenetrate by 29, so it could possibly kill somebody standing behind even if he wears body armor with steel plates.

I tried a simulation of .375H&H and .500NE against cape buffalo and bush elephant and I got very good results. I suspect some strange (maybe, too realistic?) effect can happen in special circumstances with very fast bullets (300WM, Weatherby Magnums, Norma Magnums and such), I will check in game or as soon as I have more free time.
Right OK got it (I think)

How are you getting a Wounding mod of 1.9 on this round?

going from the system you cite would suggest that bullet energy is almost double penetration, but penetration is itself Velocity x Sectional density.

Of course all this depends on how you take real life stats like Velocity and sectional density turn into gamable ones like 'penetration' (I assume round energy here is 1/2m*v^2)

Anyway lets compare to RAW

the lapua .338 is as pointed out 9d+1 pi (avg 32.5)

On basic torso hit it's capped at 10 injury (but bleeds at -6)

by raw a vitals hit would be a 98pt injury (so dead)


net result is increased immediate injury on non vital torso injuries but reduced injury on Vitals, mainly because you've applied the overpenetration cap to vitals.
Tomsdad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.